Evidence mapPaperPMID 33716206Full record

ReviewTumour virus research2021

Human papillomavirus E6 and E7: What remains?

Arushi Vats, Oscar Trejo-Cerro, Miranda Thomas, Lawrence Banks

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tumour virus research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Differential roles of type I topoisomerases in regulating HPV pathogenesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arushi VatsTumour Virology Group, ICGEB, AREA Science Park, Trieste, 34149, Italy.
Oscar Trejo-CerroTumour Virology Group, ICGEB, AREA Science Park, Trieste, 34149, Italy.
Miranda ThomasTumour Virology Group, ICGEB, AREA Science Park, Trieste, 34149, Italy. Electronic address: Miranda.Thomas@icgeb.org.
Lawrence BanksTumour Virology Group, ICGEB, AREA Science Park, Trieste, 34149, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decades of research on the human papillomavirus oncogenes, E6 and E7, have given us huge amounts of data on their expression, functions and structures. We know much about the very many cellular proteins and pathways that they influence in one way or another. However, much of this information is quite discrete, referring to one activity examined under one condition. It is now time to join the dots to try to understand a larger picture: how, where and when do all these interactions occur... and why? Examining these questions will also show how many of the yet obscure cellular processes work together for cellular and tissue homeostasis in health and disease.

Indexed as

AlphapapillomavirusOncogene Proteins, ViralHumansOncogenesPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus E7 ProteinsOncogene Proteins, ViralPapillomavirus E7 ProteinsE6E7HPV

Identifiers

PMID33716206
PMCPMC7972986

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.