Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33722211›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

'Listen and learn:' participant input in program planning for a low-income urban population at cardiovascular risk.

Rachel S Kirzner, Inga Robbins, Meghan Privitello, Marianne Miserandino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel S KirznerSchool of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Stockton University, 101 Vera King Farris Drive, Galloway, NJ, 08205, USA. Rachel.Kirzner@stockton.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9866-0714
Inga RobbinsAtlanticare Health Services, 1401 Atlantic Ave, Atlantic City, NJ, 08401, USA.
Meghan PrivitelloSexual Assault Program, AVANZAR, 927 Main Street, Building D, Pleasantville, NJ, 08232, USA.
Marianne MiserandinoPsychology, Arcadia University, 450 S Easton Rd, Glenside, PA, 19038, USA.
Arcadia University · USAtlantiCare · USStockton University · US

Funding

Stockton University SOEO4-19A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoverty increases the risk of cardiac disease, while diminishing the resources available to mitigate that risk. Available prevention programs often require resources that low-income residents of urban areas do not possess, e.g. membership fees, resources to purchase healthy foods, and safe places for physical activity. The aim of this study is to obtain participant input in order to understand the health-related goals, barriers, and strengths as part of planning a program to reduce cardiovascular risk.

methodsIn a mixed methods study, we used written surveys and focus groups as part of planning an intervention specifically designed to meet the needs of lower income individuals. Based on prior research, we used Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and its core constructs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness as the theoretical framework for analysis. The study collected information on the perspectives of low-income urban residents on their risks of cardiovascular disease, their barriers to and supports for addressing health needs, and how they addressed barriers and utilized supports. Focus group transcripts were analyzed using standard qualitative methods including paired coding and development of themes from identified codes.

resultsParticipants had health goals that aligned with accepted approaches to reducing their cardiovascular risks, however they lacked the resources to reach those goals. We found a lack of support for the three SDT core constructs. The barriers that participants reported suggested that these basic psychological needs were often thwarted by their environments.

conclusionsSubstantial disparities in both access to health-promoting resources and in support for autonomy, competence, and relatedness must be addressed in order to design an effective intervention for a low-income population at cardiac risk.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesPovertyHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansRisk FactorsUrban PopulationCardiovascular diseaseFocus groupsHealth disparitiesPeer supportProgram planningSelf-determination theory

Identifiers

PMID33722211
PMCPMC7962280
OpenAlexW3138449236

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.