Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33722879›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open quality2021

Approaches, enablers, barriers and outcomes of implementing facility-based stillbirth and neonatal death audit in LMICs: a systematic review.

Mtisunge Joshua Gondwe, John Michael Mhango, Nicola Desmond, Mamuda Aminu, Stephen Allen

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open quality, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mtisunge Joshua GondweDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK mtisungejoshua@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2091-1488
John Michael MhangoDepartment of Monitoring and Evalaution, Nurses and Midwives Council of Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Nicola DesmondBehaviour and Health Group, Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Mamuda AminuCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Stephen AllenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBChristian Health Association of Malawi · MW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify approaches, enablers, barriers and outcomes of facility stillbirth and neonatal death audit in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, Academic Search Index, Science Citation Index, Complementary index and Global health electronic databases. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were considered eligible when reporting the approaches, enablers, barriers and outcomes of facility-based stillbirth and neonatal death audit in LMICs. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently performed the data extraction using predefined templates made before data extraction. RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 10 articles from 7 countries were included in the final analysis. Facility or external multidisciplinary teams performed death audits on a weekly or monthly basis. A total of 1018 stillbirths and neonatal deaths were audited. Of 18 audit enablers identified, nine were at the health provider level while 18 of 23 barriers to audit that were identified occurred at the facility level. The facility-level barriers cited by more than one study included: failure to implement change; inadequate training; limited time; increased workload; too many cases and poor documentation. Six studies reported that death audits resulted in structural improvements in physical structure, training, service organisation, supplies and equipment in the wards. Five studies reported that death audits improved the standard of care, with one study showing a significant improvement in measured standards. One study reported a significant reduction in newborn mortality rate of 29.4% (95% CI 0.6% to 2.4%; p=0.0015) and one study a reduction in perinatal mortality of 4.9% (52.8% in 2007 to 47.9% in 2008) before and after perinatal audit implementation.

conclusionStillbirth and neonatal death audit improves facility structures, processes of care and health outcomes in neonatal care. There is a need to enhance enablers and address barriers identified at both health provider and facility levels to improve the audit process.

Indexed as

Perinatal DeathStillbirthDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornPerinatal MortalityPregnancyaudit and feedbackclinical audithospital medicinehospital mortalityinfant mortality

Identifiers

PMID33722879
PMCPMC7970257
OpenAlexW3135947075

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.