SynthesisBMJ open quality2021
Approaches, enablers, barriers and outcomes of implementing facility-based stillbirth and neonatal death audit in LMICs: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ open quality, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors affecting the collection of clinical data for quality improvement at a tertiary centre in Papua New Guinea: a qualitative study.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Optimizing Resource Utilization in Low- and Middle-Income Country NICUs: A Clinical Audit of Surgical Infection Screening Practices at a High-Volume NICU in Pakistan.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Healthcare Workers' Perspectives on the E-MOTIVE Postpartum Haemorrhage Bundle in Tanzania: A Qualitative Study of Implementation Facilitators and Challenges.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Factors influencing maternal death surveillance and review implementation in Dodoma City, Tanzania. A qualitative case study.Learning health systems · 2024Article
- Risk factors of stillbirths in four district hospitals on Pemba Island, Tanzania: a prospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- 'There is trauma all round': A qualitative study of health workers' experiences of caring for parents after stillbirth in Kenya and Uganda.Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives · 2023Article
- Factors impacting-stillbirth and neonatal death audit in Malawi: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Resource availability and barriers to delivering quality care for newborns in hospitals in the southern region of Malawi: A multisite observational study.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo identify approaches, enablers, barriers and outcomes of facility stillbirth and neonatal death audit in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, Academic Search Index, Science Citation Index, Complementary index and Global health electronic databases. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were considered eligible when reporting the approaches, enablers, barriers and outcomes of facility-based stillbirth and neonatal death audit in LMICs. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently performed the data extraction using predefined templates made before data extraction. RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 10 articles from 7 countries were included in the final analysis. Facility or external multidisciplinary teams performed death audits on a weekly or monthly basis. A total of 1018 stillbirths and neonatal deaths were audited. Of 18 audit enablers identified, nine were at the health provider level while 18 of 23 barriers to audit that were identified occurred at the facility level. The facility-level barriers cited by more than one study included: failure to implement change; inadequate training; limited time; increased workload; too many cases and poor documentation. Six studies reported that death audits resulted in structural improvements in physical structure, training, service organisation, supplies and equipment in the wards. Five studies reported that death audits improved the standard of care, with one study showing a significant improvement in measured standards. One study reported a significant reduction in newborn mortality rate of 29.4% (95% CI 0.6% to 2.4%; p=0.0015) and one study a reduction in perinatal mortality of 4.9% (52.8% in 2007 to 47.9% in 2008) before and after perinatal audit implementation.
conclusionStillbirth and neonatal death audit improves facility structures, processes of care and health outcomes in neonatal care. There is a need to enhance enablers and address barriers identified at both health provider and facility levels to improve the audit process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.