Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33726723›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021

Stacked LSTM based deep recurrent neural network with kalman smoothing for blood glucose prediction.

Md Fazle Rabby, Yazhou Tu, Md Imran Hossen, Insup Lee, Anthony S Maida, Xiali Hei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 160 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Md Fazle RabbySchool of Computing and Informatics, The University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayatte, LA, 70503, USA. md-fazle.rabby1@louisiana.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7857-5870
Yazhou TuSchool of Computing and Informatics, The University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayatte, LA, 70503, USA.
Md Imran HossenSchool of Computing and Informatics, The University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayatte, LA, 70503, USA.
Insup LeeDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Anthony S MaidaSchool of Computing and Informatics, The University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayatte, LA, 70503, USA.
Xiali HeiSchool of Computing and Informatics, The University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayatte, LA, 70503, USA.
University of Louisiana at Lafayette · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlood glucose (BG) management is crucial for type-1 diabetes patients resulting in the necessity of reliable artificial pancreas or insulin infusion systems. In recent years, deep learning techniques have been utilized for a more accurate BG level prediction system. However, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) readings are susceptible to sensor errors. As a result, inaccurate CGM readings would affect BG prediction and make it unreliable, even if the most optimal machine learning model is used.

methodsIn this work, we propose a novel approach to predicting blood glucose level with a stacked Long short-term memory (LSTM) based deep recurrent neural network (RNN) model considering sensor fault. We use the Kalman smoothing technique for the correction of the inaccurate CGM readings due to sensor error.

resultsFor the OhioT1DM (2018) dataset, containing eight weeks' data from six different patients, we achieve an average RMSE of 6.45 and 17.24 mg/dl for 30 min and 60 min of prediction horizon (PH), respectively.

conclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this is the leading average prediction accuracy for the ohioT1DM dataset. Different physiological information, e.g., Kalman smoothed CGM data, carbohydrates from the meal, bolus insulin, and cumulative step counts in a fixed time interval, are crafted to represent meaningful features used as input to the model. The goal of our approach is to lower the difference between the predicted CGM values and the fingerstick blood glucose readings-the ground truth. Our results indicate that the proposed approach is feasible for more reliable BG forecasting that might improve the performance of the artificial pancreas and insulin infusion system for T1D diabetes management.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Blood Glucose Self-MonitoringHumansInsulin Infusion SystemsNeural Networks, ComputerBlood GlucoseBlood glucose level predictionKalman smoothingRecurrent neural networkSensor fault correctionStacked long short-term memory

Identifiers

PMID33726723
PMCPMC7968367
OpenAlexW3139241726

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.