Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33729159›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

Topological signatures in regulatory network enable phenotypic heterogeneity in small cell lung cancer.

Lakshya Chauhan, Uday Ram, Kishore Hari, Mohit Kumar Jolly

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Fluctuation structure predicts genome-wide perturbation outcomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Minimal frustration underlies the usefulness of incomplete regulatory network models in biology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lakshya Chauhan *Centre for BioSystems Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5851-507X
Uday Ram *Centre for BioSystems Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Kishore HariCentre for BioSystems Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Mohit Kumar JollyCentre for BioSystems Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6631-2109
Indian Institute of Science Bangalore · IN

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board SB/S2/RJN-049/2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenotypic (non-genetic) heterogeneity has significant implications for the development and evolution of organs, organisms, and populations. Recent observations in multiple cancers have unraveled the role of phenotypic heterogeneity in driving metastasis and therapy recalcitrance. However, the origins of such phenotypic heterogeneity are poorly understood in most cancers. Here, we investigate a regulatory network underlying phenotypic heterogeneity in small cell lung cancer, a devastating disease with no molecular targeted therapy. Discrete and continuous dynamical simulations of this network reveal its multistable behavior that can explain co-existence of four experimentally observed phenotypes. Analysis of the network topology uncovers that multistability emerges from two teams of players that mutually inhibit each other, but members of a team activate one another, forming a 'toggle switch' between the two teams. Deciphering these topological signatures in cancer-related regulatory networks can unravel their 'latent' design principles and offer a rational approach to characterize phenotypic heterogeneity in a tumor.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksPhenotypeAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsGenetic HeterogeneityHumansLung NeoplasmsModels, GeneticMolecular Targeted TherapyOctamer Transcription FactorsSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaTranscription FactorsYAP-Signaling ProteinsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingASCL1 protein, humanBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsNEUROD1 protein, humanOctamer Transcription FactorsPOU2F3 protein, humanTranscription FactorsYAP1 protein, humanYAP-Signaling Proteinscomputational biologydesign principlesmultistabilitynetwork topologynonephenotypic heterogeneityphysics of living systemssmall cell lung cancersystems biologytoggle switch

Identifiers

PMID33729159
PMCPMC8012062
OpenAlexW3137958277

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.