Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33731029›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Maternal and neonatal data collection systems in low- and middle-income countries for maternal vaccines active safety surveillance systems: A scoping review.

Mabel Berrueta, Agustin Ciapponi, Ariel Bardach, Federico Rodriguez Cairoli, Fabricio J Castellano, Xu Xiong, Andy Stergachis, Sabra Zaraa, Ajoke Sobanjo-Ter Meulen, Pierre Buekens and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mabel BerruetaInstituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS), Dr. Emilio Ravignani 2024 (C1014CPV), Buenos Aires, Argentina. mberrueta@iecs.org.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7915-5643
Agustin CiapponiInstituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS), Dr. Emilio Ravignani 2024 (C1014CPV), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ariel BardachInstituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS), Dr. Emilio Ravignani 2024 (C1014CPV), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Federico Rodriguez CairoliInstituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS), Dr. Emilio Ravignani 2024 (C1014CPV), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fabricio J CastellanoInstituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS), Dr. Emilio Ravignani 2024 (C1014CPV), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Xu XiongTulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Andy StergachisUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195-7631, USA.
Sabra ZaraaUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195-7631, USA.
Ajoke Sobanjo-Ter MeulenBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA.
Pierre BuekensTulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Scoping Review Collaboration Group
Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria · ARTulane University · USUniversity of Washington · USGates Foundation · US

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation INV008443Gates Foundation INV-008443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost post-licensure vaccine pharmacovigilance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are passive reporting systems. These have limited utility for maternal immunization pharmacovigilance in LMIC settings and need to be supplemented with active surveillance. Our study's main objective was to identify existing perinatal data collection systems in LMICs that collect individual information on maternal and neonatal health outcomes and could be developed to inform active safety surveillance of novel vaccines for use during pregnancy.

methodsA scoping review was performed following the Arksey and O'Malley six-stage approach. We included studies describing electronic or mixed paper-electronic data collection systems in LMICs, including research networks, electronic medical records, and custom software platforms for health information systems. Medline PubMed, EMBASE, Global Health, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Bibliography of Asian Studies (BAS), and CINAHL were searched through August 2019. We also searched grey literature including through Google and websites of existing relevant perinatal data collection systems, as well as contacted authors of key studies and experts in the field to validate the information and identify additional sources of relevant unpublished information.

resultsA total of 11,817 records were identified. The full texts of 264 records describing 96 data collection systems were assessed for eligibility. Eight perinatal data collection systems met our inclusion criteria: Global Network's Maternal Newborn Health Registry, International Network for the Demographic Evaluation of Populations and their Health; Perinatal Informatic System; Pregnancy Exposure Registry & Birth Defects Surveillance; SmartCare; Open Medical Record System; Open Smart Register Platform and District Health Information Software 2. These selected systems were qualitatively characterized according to seven different domains: governance; system design; system management; data management; data sources, outcomes and data quality.

conclusionThis review provides a list of active maternal and neonatal data collection systems in LMICs and their characteristics as well as their outreach, strengths, and limitations. Findings could potentially help further understand where to obtain population-based high-quality information on outcomes to inform the conduct of maternal immunization active vaccine safety surveillance activities and research in LMICs.

Indexed as

Health Information SystemsInfant HealthMaternal HealthProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingData CollectionDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansImmunologic FactorsInfant, NewbornPharmacovigilancePregnancyVaccinationVaccinesImmunologic FactorsVaccinesActive surveillanceElectronic RegistriesGlobal HealthHealth Information SystemsPharmacovigilancePregnancyVaccination

Identifiers

PMID33731029
PMCPMC7968860
OpenAlexW3136415318

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.