ArticleEuropean radiology2021
Reproducibility of radiomic features in SENSE and compressed SENSE: impact of acceleration factors.
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Robustness of MRI Radiomic Features in the Abdomen: Impact of Deep Learning Reconstruction and Accelerated Acquisition.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Radiomics from multisite MRI and clinical data to predict clinically significant prostate cancer.Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) · 2024Article
- Radiomic feature reliability of amide proton transfer-weighted MR images acquired with compressed sensing at 3T.International journal of imaging systems and technology · 2024Article
- Feasibility and intra-and interobserver reproducibility of quantitative susceptibility mapping with radiomic features for intracranial dissecting intramural hematomas and atherosclerotic calcifications.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Data harmonisation for information fusion in digital healthcare: A state-of-the-art systematic review, meta-analysis and future research directions.An international journal on information fusion · 2022Article
- Stability of MRI radiomic features according to various imaging parameters in fast scanned T2-FLAIR for acute ischemic stroke patients.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the impact of acceleration factors on reproducibility of radiomic features in sensitivity encoding (SENSE) and compressed SENSE (CS), compare between SENSE and CS, and identify reproducible radiomic features.
methodsThree-dimensional turbo spin echo T1-weighted imaging was performed in 14 healthy volunteers (mean age, 57 years; range, 33-67 years; 7 men) under SENSE and CS with accelerator factors of 5.5, 6.8, and 9.7. Eight anatomical locations (brain parenchyma, salivary glands, masseter muscle, tongue, pharyngeal mucosal space, eyeballs) were evaluated. Reproducibility of radiomic features was evaluated by calculating concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) in reference to the original image (SENSE with acceleration factor of 3.5). Reproducibility of radiomic features among acceleration factors and between SENSE and CS was compared.
resultsProportion of radiomic features with CCC > 0.85 in reference to the original image was lower with higher acceleration factors in both SENSE and CS across all anatomical locations (p < .001). Proportion of radiomic features with CCC > 0.85 in reference to the original image was higher in SENSE compared with CS (SENSE, 6.7-7.3% vs CS, 4.4-5.0%; p < .001). Run percentage of gray-level run-length matrix (GLRLM) with wavelet D showed CCC > 0.85 in reference to the original image in both SENSE and CS at acceleration factor of 9.7 in the highest number of anatomical locations.
conclusionsHigher acceleration factors resulted in lower reproducibility of radiomic features in both SENSE and CS, and SENSE showed higher reproducibility of radiomic features than CS in reference to the original image. Run percentage of GLRLM with wavelet D was identified as the most reproducible feature. KEY POINTS: • Reproducibility of radiomic features in reference to the original image was lower with higher acceleration factors in both sensitivity encoding (SENSE) and compressed SENSE (CS) across all anatomical locations (p < .001). • SENSE showed higher proportions of radiomic features with CCC > 0.85 in reference to the original image (SENSE, 6.7-7.3% vs CS, 4.4-5.0%; p < .001) compared with CS. • Run percentage of gray-level run-length matrix (GLRLM) with wavelet D showed CCC > 0.85 in reference to the original image in both SENSE and CS with the highest acceleration factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33733690What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.