Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33735638›Full record

SynthesisSleep medicine reviews2021

Cultural adaptations of psychological interventions for prevalent sleep disorders and sleep disturbances: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials in the United States.

Carmela Alcántara, Luciana Giorgio Cosenzo, Elliot McCullough, Tiffany Vogt, Andrea L Falzon, Irene Perez Ibarra

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sleep medicine reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Representation of race and ethnicity among cancer survivors in trials of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I): A systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Longitudinal Associations Between Sleep and Cognitive Function in a Cohort of Older Puerto Rican Adults: Sex and Age Interactions.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Carmela AlcántaraSchool of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA. Electronic address: ca2543@columbia.edu.
Luciana Giorgio CosenzoSchool of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Elliot McCulloughSchool of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Tiffany VogtSchool of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Andrea L FalzonFeinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA.
Irene Perez IbarraAragonese Foundation for Research, Zaragoza, Spain; AgriFood Institute of Aragon, University of Zaragoza, Spain.
Columbia University · USNorthwell Health · USUniversidad de Zaragoza · ES

Funding

Using eHealth to Expand Access to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Hispanic Primary Care PatientsR01HS024274 · AHRQ · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI ALCANTARA, CARMELA · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
Identifying Novel Behavioral Targets for Improving Sleep: A Self-Regulation ModelK23HL125748 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI ALCANTARA, CARMELA · 2015 to 2019
$924k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS024274NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL125748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychological interventions for sleep-wake disorders have medium-to-large effect sizes, however whether behavioral randomized controlled trials (RCTs) targeted underserved populations or addressed contextual and cultural factors is unknown. We conducted a systematic review to: (a) examine sociodemographic characteristics of behavioral RCTs for prevalent sleep-wake disorders and sleep disturbances that targeted undeserved adults, (b) identify types of cultural adaptations (surface-level, deep-level), and (c) describe intervention effectiveness on primary sleep outcomes. Overall, 6.97% of RCTs (56 studies) targeted underserved groups (veterans, women, racial/ethnic minorities, low socioeconomic status, disability status); 64.29% made surface-level and/or deep-level cultural adaptations. There was a lack of racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, sexual orientation, and linguistic diversity. Most cultural adaptations were made to behavioral therapies, and cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I). Surface-level cultural adaptations to the delivery modality and setting were most common. Deep-level cultural adaptations of the content and core intervention components were also typical. Intervention effectiveness varied by type of adapted intervention and participant population. RCTs of adapted CBT-I interventions among participants with a definite sleep disorder or sleep disturbance showed consistent significant reductions in adverse sleep outcomes versus control. These findings have important implications for the use of cultural adaptations to address behavioral sleep medicine disparities.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapySleep Wake DisordersAdultFemaleHumansPsychosocial InterventionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSleepUnited StatesCultural tailoringEffectivenessMental health care disparitiesPsychological treatmentsSleepUnderserved

Identifiers

PMID33735638
PMCPMC11600432
OpenAlexW3126256883

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.