Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33737862›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021

Intra-Arterial Stem Cell Transplantation in Experimental Stroke in Rats: Real-Time MR Visualization of Transplanted Cells Starting With Their First Pass Through the Brain With Regard to the Therapeutic Action.

Daria D Namestnikova, Ilya L Gubskiy, Veronica A Revkova, Kirill K Sukhinich, Pavel A Melnikov, Anna N Gabashvili, Elvira A Cherkashova, Daniil A Vishnevskiy, Victoria V Kurilo, Veronica V Burunova and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. OPTRACE: Optical Imaging-Guided Transplantation and Tracking of Cells in the Mouse Brain.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Advances in stem cells treatment of diabetic wounds: A bibliometric analysis via CiteSpace.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Internalization of transferrin-taggedExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Research progress and challenges of stem cell therapy for ischemic stroke.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Daria D NamestnikovaDepartment of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Ilya L GubskiyDepartment of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Veronica A RevkovaCell Technology Laboratory, Federal Research and Clinical Center of Specialized Medical Care and Medical Technologies of the Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Kirill K SukhinichLaboratory of Problems of Regeneration, Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Pavel A MelnikovCell Technology Laboratory, Federal Research and Clinical Center of Specialized Medical Care and Medical Technologies of the Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Anna N GabashviliLaboratory of Biomedical Nanomaterials, National University of Science and Technology "MISIS", Moscow, Russia.
Elvira A CherkashovaDepartment of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Daniil A VishnevskiyDepartment of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Victoria V KuriloDepartment of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Veronica V BurunovaLaboratory of Cell Biology, Orekhovich Institute of Biomedical Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Alevtina S SemkinaDepartment of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Maxim A AbakumovDepartment of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Leonid V GubskyDepartment of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Vladimir P ChekhoninDepartment of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Jan-Eric AhlforsNew World Laboratories, Laval, QC, Canada.
Vladimir P BaklaushevCell Technology Laboratory, Federal Research and Clinical Center of Specialized Medical Care and Medical Technologies of the Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Konstantin N YaryginLaboratory of Cell Biology, Orekhovich Institute of Biomedical Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University · RUFederal Medical-Biological Agency · RUMinistry of Health of the Russian Federation · RURussian Academy of Sciences · RUFederal Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology · RUKoltzov Institute of Developmental Biology · RUNational University of Science and Technology · RUNew World Laboratories · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell therapy is an emerging approach to stroke treatment with a potential to limit brain damage and enhance its restoration after the acute phase of the disease. In this study we tested directly reprogrammed neural precursor cells (drNPC) derived from adult human bone marrow cells in the rat middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model of acute ischemic stroke using human placenta mesenchymal stem cells (pMSC) as a positive control with previously confirmed efficacy. Cells were infused into the ipsilateral (right) internal carotid artery of male Wistar rats 24 h after MCAO. The main goal of this work was to evaluate real-time distribution and subsequent homing of transplanted cells in the brain. This was achieved by performing intra-arterial infusion directly inside the MRI scanner and allowed transplanted cells tracing starting from their first pass through the brain vessels. Immediately after transplantation, cells were observed in the periphery of the infarct zone and in the brain stem, 15 min later small numbers of cells could be discovered deep in the infarct core and in the contralateral hemisphere, where drNPC were seen earlier and in greater numbers than pMSC. Transplanted cells in both groups could no longer be detected in the rat brain 48-72 h after infusion. Histological and histochemical analysis demonstrated that both the drNPC and pMSC were localized inside blood vessels in close contact with the vascular wall. No passage of labeled cells through the blood brain barrier was observed. Additionally, the therapeutic effects of drNPC and pMSC were compared. Both drNPC and pMSC induced substantial attenuation of neurological deficits evaluated at the 7th and 14th day after transplantation using the modified neurological severity score (mNSS). Some of the effects of drNPC and pMSC, such as the influence on the infarct volume and the survival rate of animals, differed. The results suggest a paracrine mechanism of the positive therapeutic effects of IA drNPC and pMSC infusion, potentially enhanced by the cell-cell interactions. Our data also indicate that the long-term homing of transplanted cells in the brain is not necessary for the brain's functional recovery.

Indexed as

cell reprogrammingdirectly reprogrammed neural precursor cellsexperimental strokeintra-arterial cell transplantationmesenchymal stem cellsmiddle cerebral artery occlusionreal-time MRI

Identifiers

PMID33737862
PMCPMC7960930
OpenAlexW3135052311

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.