Evidence mapPaperPMID 33738783Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2021

The Future of Incretin-Based Approaches for Neurodegenerative Diseases in Older Adults: Which to Choose? A Review of their Potential Efficacy and Suitability.

Christine Girges, Nirosen Vijiaratnam, Dilan Athauda, Grace Auld, Sonia Gandhi, Thomas Foltynie

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for major neurocognitive disorders.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christine GirgesDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5019-6812
Nirosen VijiaratnamDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Dilan AthaudaDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Grace AuldComprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, UCL, London, UK.
Sonia GandhiDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Thomas FoltynieDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK. t.foltynie@ucl.ac.uk.
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBUK Dementia Research Institute · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T008199/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current treatment options for neurodegenerative diseases in older adults rely mainly on providing symptomatic relief. Yet, it remains imperative to identify agents that slow or halt disease progression to avoid the most disabling features often associated with advanced disease stages. A potential overlap between the pathological processes involved in diabetes and neurodegeneration has been established, raising the question of whether incretin-based therapies for diabetes may also be useful in treating neurodegenerative diseases in older adults. Here, we review the different agents that belong to this class of drugs (GLP-1 receptor agonists, dual/triple receptor agonists, DPP-4 inhibitors) and describe the data supporting their potential role in treating neurodegenerative conditions including Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease. We further discuss whether there are any distinctive properties among them, particularly in the context of safety or tolerability and CNS penetration, that might facilitate their successful repurposing as disease-modifying drugs. Proof-of-efficacy data will obviously be of the greatest importance, and this is most likely to be demonstrable in agents that reach the central nervous system and impact on neuronal GLP-1 receptors. Additionally, however, the long-term safety and tolerability (including gastrointestinal side effects and unwanted weight loss) as well as the route of administration of this class of agents may also ultimately determine success and these aspects should be considered in prioritising which approaches to subject to formal clinical trial evaluations.

Indexed as

Neurodegenerative DiseasesAgedDipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsHumansIncretinsWeight LossDipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsIncretins

Identifiers

PMID33738783
OpenAlexW3137423887

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.