Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33739422›Full record

Trial reportTranslational behavioral medicine2021

Effect of tailoring on weight loss among young adults receiving digital interventions: an 18 month randomized controlled trial.

Melissa A Napolitano, Jessica A Whiteley, Meghan Mavredes, Ashley Hogan Tjaden, Samuel Simmens, Laura L Hayman, Jamie Faro, Ginger Winston, Steven Malin, Loretta DiPietro

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational behavioral medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Longitudinal timing of physical activity and associated cardiometabolic and behavioral health outcomes in young adults.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Digital Media for Behavior Change: Review of an Emerging Field of Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa A NapolitanoDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, 950 New Hampshire Ave, 3rd Floor, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Jessica A WhiteleyCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, The University of Massachusetts at Boston, Boston, MA 02125, USA.
Meghan MavredesDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, 950 New Hampshire Ave, 3rd Floor, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Ashley Hogan TjadenDepartment of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Samuel SimmensDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Laura L HaymanCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, The University of Massachusetts at Boston, Boston, MA 02125, USA.
Jamie FaroDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, The University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA.
Ginger WinstonDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, 950 New Hampshire Ave, 3rd Floor, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Steven MalinDepartments of Kinesiology and Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nutrition, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Loretta DiPietroDepartment of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, 950 New Hampshire Ave, 2nd Floor, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
George Washington University · USMilken Institute · USUniversity of Massachusetts Boston · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

Translation of social media obesity treatment into two college campus communitiesR01DK100916 · NIDDK · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI NAPOLITANO, MELISSA A · 2014 to 2018
$3.3M
K12 Cardiopulmonary Implementation Science Scholars ProgramK12HL138049 · NHLBI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LEMON, STEPHENIE C., LINDENAUER, PETER KYLE · 2017 to 2021
$2.7M
Prevention And Control of Cancer: Training for Change in Individuals and SystemsT32CA172009 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LEMON, STEPHENIE C., OCKENE, JUDITH K · 2019 to 2023
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA172009NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL138049NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK100916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weight loss outcomes among young adults in technology-based programs have been equivocal. The purpose of this study was to deliver digital weight loss treatments to young adults and examine the 6, 12, and 18 month effects on weight loss. Young adults with overweight/obesity (N = 459; 23.3 ± 4.4 years) were recruited from two university sites and randomly assigned to receive through Facebook and text messaging either personalized (TAILORED; n = 150) or generic (TARGETED; n = 152) weight loss information, messages, and feedback or general healthy body content (e.g., body image, sleep; CONTROL; n = 157). The study was powered to detect a 2.1-kg difference at all time points with the primary outcome being 18 months. There was no overall effect of treatment group on 6, 12, or 18 month weight loss (ps = NS). However, at 6 months, those in TAILORED who were highly engaged (completing >66%) lost more weight compared to CONTROL (-2.32 kg [95% confidence intervals: -3.90, -0.74]; p = .004), with the trend continuing at 12 months. A significant baseline body mass index (BMI) by treatment group interaction (p = .004) was observed at 6 months. Among participants in the lowest baseline BMI category (25-27.5 kg/m2), those in TAILORED lost 2.27 kg (-3.86, -0.68) more, and those in TARGETED lost 1.72 kg (-3.16, -0.29) more than CONTROL after adjusting for covariates. Among participants with a BMI between 27.5 and 30 kg/m2, those in TAILORED lost 2.20 kg (-3.90, -0.51) more than participants in TARGETED. Results did not persist over time with no treatment interaction at 12 or 18 months. Initial body weight should be considered when recommending weight loss treatments for young adults. More intensive interventions or stepped care approaches may be needed for young adults with obesity.

Indexed as

Weight LossWeight Reduction ProgramsBody Mass IndexBody WeightHumansObesityOverweightYoung AdultDigital interventionsObesityTailoringWeight lossYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID33739422
PMCPMC8075613
OpenAlexW3139279937

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.