Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33743089›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2021

Surgical Management of Skull Base and Spine Chordomas.

Joel Z Passer, Christopher Alvarez-Breckenridge, Laurence Rhines, Franco DeMonte, Claudio Tatsui, Shaan M Raza

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Metastatic skull base chordoma: A systematic review.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Fluorescent intraoperative navigation: trends and beyond.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joel Z Passer *Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 442, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2526-1496
Christopher Alvarez-Breckenridge *Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 442, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA.
Laurence RhinesDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 442, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA.
Franco DeMonteDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 442, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA.
Claudio TatsuiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 442, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA.
Shaan M RazaDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 442, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA. smraza@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementManagement of chordoma along the cranial-spinal axis is a major challenge for both skull base and spinal surgeons. Although chordoma remains a rare tumor, occurring in approximately 1 per 1 million individuals, its treatment poses several challenges. These tumors are generally poorly responsive to radiation and chemotherapy, leading to surgical resection as the mainstay of treatment. Due to anatomic constraints and unique challenges associated with each primary site of disease, gross total resection is often not feasible and is associated with high rates of morbidity. Additionally, chordoma is associated with high rates of recurrence due to the tumor's aggressive biologic features, and postoperative radiation is increasingly incorporated as a treatment option for these patients. Despite these challenges, modern-day surgical techniques in both skull base and spinal surgery have facilitated improved patient outcomes. For example, endoscopic endonasal techniques have become the mainstay in resection of skull base chordomas, improving the ability to achieve gross total resection, while reducing associated morbidity of open transfacial techniques. Resection of spinal chordomas has been facilitated by emerging techniques in preoperative imaging, intraoperative navigation, spinal reconstruction, and radiotherapy. Taken collectively, the treatment of chordoma affecting the skull base and spinal requires a multidisciplinary team of surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists who specialize in the treatment of this challenging disease.

Indexed as

ChordomaHumansNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPlastic Surgery ProceduresRadiotherapy, AdjuvantSkull Base NeoplasmsSpinal NeoplasmsSurgery, Computer-AssistedTreatment OutcomeChordomaChordoma surgeryEndoscopic endonasal approachEnneking classificationPrimary bone tumorSacrectomy

Identifiers

PMID33743089
OpenAlexW3137682471

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.