Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33746394›Full record

ReviewJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology2021

A critical review of the applicability of serological screening for Leishmaniasis in blood banks in Brazil.

Wellington Francisco Rodrigues, Niege Silva Mendes, Patrícia de Carvalho Ribeiro, Daniel Mendes Filho, Ricardo Cambraia Parreira, Karen Cristina Barbosa Chaves, Melissa Carvalho Martins de Abreu, Camila Botelho Miguel

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Leishmaniasis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  2. Asymptomatic Leishmania Infection among Blood Donors in a Southern Province of Thailand.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Assessment of Risk of Exposure toPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Wellington Francisco RodriguesHealth Sciences, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba, MG Brazil.
Niege Silva MendesDepartment of Genetics, Medical School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP Brazil.
Patrícia de Carvalho RibeiroLaboratory of Immunology and Experimental Transplantation, Medical School of São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP), São José do Rio Preto, SP Brazil.
Daniel Mendes FilhoNanocell Institute, Divinópolis, Brazil.
Ricardo Cambraia ParreiraNanocell Institute, Divinópolis, Brazil.
Karen Cristina Barbosa ChavesHealth Sciences from the Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP Brazil.
Melissa Carvalho Martins de AbreuUniversity Centre of Mineiros (UNIFIMES), Rua 22, Setor Aeroporto, Mineiros, GO 75.830-000 Brazil.
Camila Botelho MiguelUniversity Centre of Mineiros (UNIFIMES), Rua 22, Setor Aeroporto, Mineiros, GO 75.830-000 Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1834-1394
Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro · BRUniversidade de Ribeirão Preto · BRFaculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leishmaniasis is a group of diseases caused by several species of protozoa. It is a major public health concern in its visceral form, accounting annually for 59,000 deaths, and an estimated 12 million infected patients per year. The importance of VL resides not only in its high incidence and wide distribution but also in the possibility of the disease progressing to the severe and lethal forms, especially in children and immunosuppressed individuals, when associated with malnutrition and concomitant infections. This study is a bibliographical review, aiming to understand the sensitivity and specificity parameters of the tests used to detect Leishmaniasis, as well as to understand if there is any relevance in proposing a serological screening for Leishmaniasis in blood banks. In general, we observed that there are currently several types of tests for detecting Leishmaniasis: parasitological, serological and molecular. In such tests, many serological methods and kits are available for the detection of asymptomatic visceral leishmaniasis, but there is variability in sensitivity and specificity among the methods. The gold standard for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis is the parasitological method, through the aspiration of bone marrow, with higher sensitivity by splenic puncture. Due to the relevance of the disease and the available data from research centers, there is evidence to propose a transfusion serological screening for visceral Leishmaniasis, pointing to the need for further studies.

Indexed as

Bibliographic reviewBlood transfusionDiagnosisVisceral Leishmaniasis

Identifiers

PMID33746394
PMCPMC7921252
OpenAlexW3092047175

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.