ReviewHuman reproduction update2021
Secretory products of the corpus luteum and preeclampsia.
Review in Human reproduction update, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after natural versus artificial cycle frozen embryo transfer and the role of luteal phase support: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Human reproduction update · 2023Pooled it
- The influence of embryo stage on obstetric complications and perinatal outcomes following programmed compared to natural frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Pooled it
- Systematic review update and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials of ovarian stimulation versus artificial cycle for endometrial preparation prior to frozen embryo transfer in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2022Pooled it
- Low Luteal Serum Progesterone Levels Are Associated With Lower Ongoing Pregnancy and Live Birth Rates in ART: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Pooled it
- Natural ovulation versus programmed regimens before frozen embryo transfer in ovulatory women: multicentre, randomised clinical trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2026Trial
- Comparison of pregnancy outcomes and vaginal microbiota in women with endometriosis undergoing frozen embryo transfer using letrozole combined with HMG versus hormone replacement therapy with GnRH-a pretreatment.Journal of biomedical research · 2026Article
- Association of pre-pregnancy abnormal glucose metabolism and insulin resistance with assisted reproductive technology outcomes and pregnancy complications in women with PCOS: a retrospective propensity score matching study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Management of infertility in women with hypothalamic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: an expert opinion.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026Review
- The type of endometrial preparation for embryo transfer after egg donation affects obstetric outcomes and the expression of placental angiogenic biomarkers.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026Article
- Integrated hormonal, metabolic, and epigenetic regulation of corpus luteum function: insights into steroidogenesis, angiogenesis, and regression.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Ovulation induction or artificial programmed protocol: which endometrial preparation approach is more favorable in reducing obstetrical and neonatal complications for ovulation disorder patients undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer?Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Comparison of the efficacy of letrozole-ovulation induction cycle, natural cycle, and hormonal replacement therapy cycle in cryopreserved embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Frozen versus fresh embryo transfer on perinatal outcomes-do endometrial preparation methods matter?Human reproduction open · 2026Article
- Pregnancy and obstetric-neonatal outcomes of patients with thin endometrium using three different endometrial preparation protocols in frozen embryo transfer cycles: a historical cohort of 2671 patients.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Exploring the plasma proteome linked to corpus luteum presence and conception mode across pregnancy stages and postpartum.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Comparing programmed, modified natural and natural cycle frozen embryo transfer on obstetric outcomes in polycystic ovary syndrome: a national cohort study.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Live birth rates in natural compared to artificial frozen blastocyst transfer cycles.Reproduction & fertility · 2025Article
- Adding short-duration gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist and gonadotropin to natural cycle frozen embryo transfer allowed scheduling of transfer day without compromising live birth.Fertility and sterility · 2025Article
- Prenatally androgenized PCOS mice have ovary-independent uterine dysfunction and placental inflammation aggravated by high-fat diet.Science advances · 2025Article
- Relationship between relaxin-2 levels in serum and mode of conception in twin gestations: A prospective cohort study.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite significant advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of preeclampsia (PE), there are still many unknowns and controversies in the field. Women undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) to a hormonally prepared endometrium have been found to have an unexpected increased risk of PE compared to women who receive embryos in a natural FET cycle. The differences in risk have been hypothesized to be related to the absence or presence of a functioning corpus luteum (CL). OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: To evaluate the literature on secretory products of the CL that could be essential for a healthy pregnancy and could reduce the risk of PE in the setting of FET. SEARCH
methodsFor this review, pertinent studies were searched in PubMed/Medline (updated June 2020) using common keywords applied in the field of assisted reproductive technologies, CL physiology and preeclampsia. We also screened the complete list of references in recent publications in English (both animal and human studies) on the topics investigated. Given the design of this work as a narrative review, no formal criteria for study selection or appraisal were utilized. OUTCOMES: The CL is a major source of multiple factors regulating reproduction. Progesterone, estradiol, relaxin and vasoactive and angiogenic substances produced by the CL have important roles in regulating its functional lifespan and are also secreted into the circulation to act remotely during early stages of pregnancy. Beyond the known actions of progesterone and estradiol on the uterus in early pregnancy, their metabolites have angiogenic properties that may optimize implantation and placentation. Serum levels of relaxin are almost undetectable in pregnant women without a CL, which precludes some maternal cardiovascular and renal adaptations to early pregnancy. We suggest that an imbalance in steroid hormones and their metabolites and polypeptides influencing early physiologic processes such as decidualization, implantation, angiogenesis and maternal haemodynamics could contribute to the increased PE risk among women undergoing programmed FET cycles. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: A better understanding of the critical roles of the secretory products of the CL during early pregnancy holds the promise of improving the efficacy and safety of ART based on programmed FET cycles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.