Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33765909›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

Combined embedding model for MiRNA-disease association prediction.

Bailong Liu, Xiaoyan Zhu, Lei Zhang, Zhizheng Liang, Zhengwei Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Hierarchical graph attention network for miRNA-disease association prediction.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bailong LiuEngineering Research Center of Mine Digitalization of Ministry of Education, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China.
Xiaoyan ZhuEngineering Research Center of Mine Digitalization of Ministry of Education, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China.
Lei ZhangEngineering Research Center of Mine Digitalization of Ministry of Education, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China. zhanglei@cumt.edu.cn.
Zhizheng LiangEngineering Research Center of Mine Digitalization of Ministry of Education, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China.
Zhengwei LiEngineering Research Center of Mine Digitalization of Ministry of Education, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China. zwli@cumt.edu.cn.
China University of Mining and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCumulative evidence from biological experiments has confirmed that miRNAs have significant roles to diagnose and treat complex diseases. However, traditional medical experiments have limitations in time-consuming and high cost so that they fail to find the unconfirmed miRNA and disease interactions. Thus, discovering potential miRNA-disease associations will make a contribution to the decrease of the pathogenesis of diseases and benefit disease therapy. Although, existing methods using different computational algorithms have favorable performances to search for the potential miRNA-disease interactions. We still need to do some work to improve experimental results.

resultsWe present a novel combined embedding model to predict MiRNA-disease associations (CEMDA) in this article. The combined embedding information of miRNA and disease is composed of pair embedding and node embedding. Compared with the previous heterogeneous network methods that are merely node-centric to simply compute the similarity of miRNA and disease, our method fuses pair embedding to pay more attention to capturing the features behind the relative information, which models the fine-grained pairwise relationship better than the previous case when each node only has a single embedding. First, we construct the heterogeneous network from supported miRNA-disease pairs, disease semantic similarity and miRNA functional similarity. Given by the above heterogeneous network, we find all the associated context paths of each confirmed miRNA and disease. Meta-paths are linked by nodes and then input to the gate recurrent unit (GRU) to directly learn more accurate similarity measures between miRNA and disease. Here, the multi-head attention mechanism is used to weight the hidden state of each meta-path, and the similarity information transmission mechanism in a meta-path of miRNA and disease is obtained through multiple network layers. Second, pair embedding of miRNA and disease is fed to the multi-layer perceptron (MLP), which focuses on more important segments in pairwise relationship. Finally, we combine meta-path based node embedding and pair embedding with the cost function to learn and predict miRNA-disease association. The source code and data sets that verify the results of our research are shown at https://github.com/liubailong/CEMDA .

conclusionsThe performance of CEMDA in the leave-one-out cross validation and fivefold cross validation are 93.16% and 92.03%, respectively. It denotes that compared with other methods, CEMDA accomplishes superior performance. Three cases with lung cancers, breast cancers, prostate cancers and pancreatic cancers show that 48,50,50 and 50 out of the top 50 miRNAs, which are confirmed in HDMM V2.0. Thus, this further identifies the feasibility and effectiveness of our method.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMicroRNAsNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsHumansMaleSoftwareMicroRNAsCombined embeddingMeta-pathMiRNA and disease interactionsNode embeddingPair embedding

Identifiers

PMID33765909
PMCPMC7995599
OpenAlexW3139418566

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.