Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33770313›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2021

Clinical and genomic assessment of PD-L1 SP142 expression in triple-negative breast cancer.

Sung Gwe Ahn, Seon-Kyu Kim, Jonathan H Shepherd, Yoon Jin Cha, Soong June Bae, Chungyeul Kim, Joon Jeong, Charles M Perou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sung Gwe Ahn *Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 712 Eon-juro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seon-Kyu Kim *Personalized Genomic Medicine Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB),, Daejeon, Korea.
Jonathan H ShepherdLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Yoon Jin ChaDepartment of Pathology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soong June BaeDepartment of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 712 Eon-juro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chungyeul KimDepartment of Pathology, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Joon JeongDepartment of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 712 Eon-juro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea. gsjjoon@yuhs.ac.
Charles M PerouLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. cperou@med.unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9827-2247
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USYonsei University · KRKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology · KRKorea University Medical Center · KR

Funding

Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention HI14C3396National Research Foundation of Korea 2019R1C1C1002830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe SP142 PD-L1 assay is a companion diagnostic for atezolizumab in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We strove to understand the biological, genomic, and clinical characteristics associated with SP142 PD-L1 positivity in TNBC patients.

methodsUsing 149 TNBC formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples, tissue microarray (TMA) and gene expression microarrays were performed in parallel. The VENTANA SP142 assay was used to identify PD-L1 expression from TMA slides. We next generated a gene signature reflective of SP142 status and evaluated signature distribution according to TNBCtype and PAM50 subtypes. A SP142 gene expression signature was identified and was biologically and clinically evaluated on the TNBCs of TCGA, other cohorts, and on other malignancies treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).

resultsUsing SP142, 28.9% of samples were PD-L1 protein positive. The SP142 PD-L1-positive TNBC had higher CD8+ T cell percentage, stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte levels, and higher rate of the immunomodulatory TNBCtype compared to PD-L1-negative samples. The recurrence-free survival was prolonged in PD-L1-positive TNBC. The SP142-guided gene expression signature consisted of 94 immune-related genes. The SP142 signature was associated with a higher pathologic complete response rate and better survival in multiple TNBC cohorts. In the TNBC of TCGA, this signature was correlated with lymphocyte-infiltrating signature scores, but not with tumor mutational burden or total neoantigen count. In other malignancies treated with ICIs, the SP142 genomic signature was associated with improved response and survival.

conclusionsWe provide multi-faceted evidence that SP142 PDL1-positive TNBC have immuno-genomic features characterized as highly lymphocyte-infiltrated and a relatively favorable survival.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsGenomicsHumansImmunohistochemistryPrognosisB7-H1 AntigenImmune-check point inhibitorsSP142 PD-L1Triple-negative breast cancerTumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID33770313
PMCPMC8233296
OpenAlexW3137546763

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.