Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33771652›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2021

Methodological and analytical issues of progressive ratio schedules: Definition and scaling of breakpoint.

Vladimir L Tsibulsky, Andrew B Norman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. FGF21 analogue PF-05231023 on alcohol consumption and neuronal activity in the nucleus accumbens.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Increased sucrose consumption in mice gene-targeted forFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vladimir L TsibulskyDepartment of Pharmacology and Systems Physiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA. Electronic address: vladimir.tsibulsky@uc.edu.
Andrew B NormanDepartment of Pharmacology and Systems Physiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA.

Funding

IND-Enabling Pre-Clinical Studies to Accelerate the Clinical Development of a Humanized Anti-Cocaine Monoclonal AntibodyU01DA050330 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI NORMAN, ANDREW B · 2019 to 2021
$4.1M
A Human Antibody as an Immunotherapy for Cocaine Abuse (DP1)DP1DA031386 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI NORMAN, ANDREW B · 2010 to 2014
$3.8M
NIDA NIH HHS DP1 DA031386NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA050330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe break point (BP) of the progressive ratio (PR) schedule of drug delivery is a well-recognized parameter in self-administration studies. Nonetheless, two problems remain unresolved: there is no rationally justified criterion for the last response at BP; the both commonly used definitions of BP as the number of deliveries or the last complete progressive ratio requirement are not the best assuming that BP is a measure of motivation. NEW

methodA criterion for the last lever press is proposed in this study using intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats. The rationale is based on the finding that long inter-press intervals have initially very low probability to occur during the self-administration phase of the session under the PR schedule. But this probability dramatically increases when inter-injection intervals increase due to high ratio requirements.

resultsFor cocaine these critical inter-press intervals were 7.5 min and longer. This novel criterion was applied to measure BP according to all four theoretically plausible definitions of BP including the new one: the higher of the two numbers of presses before or after the last delivery of the reinforcer. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING

methodThe conventionally defined BP is significantly lower (by 12 %) than BP defined according to the new proposed definition. The new definition of BP provides not only a more accurate value of BP but now the variance of BP at different cocaine doses is homogeneous as required by many statistical tests.

conclusionThese new definitions of the last press and BP provide more accurate and statistically homogenous measure of BP.

Indexed as

CocaineAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugMotivationRatsReinforcement ScheduleSelf AdministrationCocaineBreakpointCocaineDefinitionsDrug addictionInter-press intervalsProgressive ratio scheduleSelf-administration

Identifiers

PMID33771652
PMCPMC8074344

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.