Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33777948›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2021

The Frequent Sampling of Wound Scratch Assay Reveals the "Opportunity" Window for Quantitative Evaluation of Cell Motility-Impeding Drugs.

Sholpan Kauanova, Arshat Urazbayev, Ivan Vorobjev

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Wound Healing Assay.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Development and Characterization of an Oral Mucoadhesive Patch Containing Amla (International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evaluation of Antiproliferative Properties of CoMnZn-FePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sholpan KauanovaSchool of Science and Humanities, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
Arshat UrazbayevNational Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
Ivan VorobjevSchool of Science and Humanities, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
Nazarbayev University · KZ

Funding

Phase 2B Trial of Memantine for the Treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisR01FD003937 · FDA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI BAROHN, RICHARD J. · 2013 to 2020
$984k
FDA HHS R01 FD003937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound healing assay performed with automated microscopy is widely used in drug testing, cancer cell analysis, and similar approaches. It is easy to perform, and the results are reproducible. However, it is usually used as a semi-quantitative approach because of inefficient image segmentation in transmitted light microscopy. Recently, several algorithms for wound healing quantification were suggested, but none of them was tested on a large dataset. In the current study, we develop a pipeline allowing to achieve correct segmentation of the wound edges in >95% of pictures and extended statistical data processing to eliminate errors of cell culture artifacts. Using this tool, we collected data on wound healing dynamics of 10 cell lines with 10 min time resolution. We determine that the overall kinetics of wound healing is non-linear; however, all cell lines demonstrate linear wound closure dynamics in a 6-h window between the fifth and 12th hours after scratching. We next analyzed microtubule-inhibiting drugs', nocodazole, vinorelbine, and Taxol, action on the kinetics of wound healing in the drug concentration-dependent way. Within this time window, the measurements of velocity of the cell edge allow the detection of statistically significant data when changes did not exceed 10-15%. All cell lines show decrease in the wound healing velocity at millimolar concentrations of microtubule inhibitors. However, dose-dependent response was cell line specific and drug specific. Cell motility was completely inhibited (edge velocity decreased 100%), while in others, it decreased only slightly (not more than 50%). Nanomolar doses (10-100 nM) of microtubule inhibitors in some cases even elevated cell motility. We speculate that anti-microtubule drugs might have specific effects on cell motility not related to the inhibition of the dynamic instability of microtubules.

Indexed as

cell motilityhigh-throughputlabel-free microscopylive-cell imagingsegmentation automationwound healing

Identifiers

PMID33777948
PMCPMC7991799
OpenAlexW3133997733

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.