Trial reportJMIR mHealth and uHealth2021
Comparing the Efficacies of Telemedicine and Standard Prenatal Care on Blood Glucose Control in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Research on Mobile Medical Used for the Management of Pregnant Women: a Randomized Control Trail
WhatsApp Intervention for Seniors' Digital and Cognitive Management (WISDOM): a Mixed-methods Pilot Study
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Effects of digital health interventions on objectively measured physical activity during the perinatal period: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of mobile health technology on physical activity in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Pooled it
- Association of Digital Health Interventions With Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- The Effect of Smartphone Application-Based Self-Management Interventions Compared to Face-to-Face Diabetic Interventions for Pregnant Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of diabetes research · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of mHealth interventions on maternal, newborn, and child health from conception to 24 months postpartum in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.BMC medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of Prenatal Care on Perinatal Outcomes of Pregnant Women with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Web-Based Interventions for Pregnant Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- Community-based non-pharmacological interventions for pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.BMC women's health · 2022Pooled it
- Long-Term Mobile-Based Glycemic Intervention for Secondary Prevention in Patients With Diabetes Undergoing Surgical Revascularization: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of a Telemedicine System in Patients With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (TELEGLAM): Single-Center, 2-Arm, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Trial
- Nutritional guidance through digital media for glycemic control of women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a randomized clinical trial.Journal of perinatal medicine · 2025Trial
- The implementation of online and offline hybrid weight management approach for pregnant women based on the Fogg behavior model in Hainan, China: a pilot randomized controlled trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Trial
- Using Group Chats to Drive Behavior Change in Digital Health Interventions: Scoping Review and Realist Synthesis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Obesity Prevention and Reduction in China Using the Social Media Platform WeChat: Scoping Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Exploring nurse and patient perspectives on WeChat-based prenatal education in Chinese public hospitals: a qualitative inquiry.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Informatics Interventions for Maternal Morbidity: Scoping Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Article
- Self-care interventions among women with gestational diabetes mellitus in low and middle-income countries: a scoping review.Systematic reviews · 2025Article
- Implementing telemedicine for the care of women with gestational diabetes mellitus in a rural hospital: an observational retrospective study.BMC health services research · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) can usually be well controlled by health education and lifestyle management, resulting in better pregnancy outcomes. However, standard clinical prenatal care, which consists of clinic visits every 2 weeks, may not provide sufficient management for women with GDM. Telemedicine demonstrates a potential to fill this gap.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to investigate whether health education and lifestyle management delivered through a WeChat group chat was more effective in controlling blood glucose (BG) than standard clinical prenatal care among women with GDM.
methodsIn this multicenter randomized controlled trial, women with GDM diagnosed by an oral glucose tolerance test between 23 and 30 (+6) gestational weeks were randomized to a WeChat group chat-based BG management group or a routine clinical prenatal care group. The primary outcome was the change in the glycemic qualification rate during the follow-up period in both groups. The secondary outcomes were pregnancy outcomes.
resultsA total of 309 women with GDM participated in the trial, with 162 women randomized to the control group and 147 to the intervention group. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were found between the control and intervention groups. Participants were further divided into 4 groups according to gestational weeks at enrollment for further analysis. The glycemic qualification rate of the intervention group was higher than that of the control group at nearly all time points in Groups 1 to 3, among which 3 time points reached statistical significance: Group 1 at T3 (54.8% vs 83.3%) and Group 2 at T3 (62.5% vs 80.0%) and T7 (75.0% vs 100%). The glycemic qualification rate gradually increased as gestational weeks progressed in both groups, regardless of the intervention method. None of the pregnancy outcomes measured, including delivery mode, premature rupture of the membranes, preterm birth, infant's birth weight, and postpartum hemorrhage, were significantly different between the control and intervention groups.
conclusionsThis multicenter randomized controlled trial that assessed women with noninsulin-dependent GDM demonstrated that additional instant messaging platforms, such as WeChat, used for health education and lifestyle intervention in China tend to be more effective for BG control than standard clinical prenatal care alone.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03748576; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03748576.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.