Evidence mapPaperPMID 33784356Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

Statins for major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Riccardo De Giorgi, Franco De Crescenzo, Nicola Rizzo Pesci, Marieke Martens, Wendy Howard, Philip J Cowen, Catherine J Harmer

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Riccardo De GiorgiDepartment of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5984-8696
Franco De CrescenzoDepartment of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
Nicola Rizzo PesciDepartment of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3830-1485
Marieke MartensDepartment of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
Wendy HowardDepartment of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
Philip J CowenDepartment of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
Catherine J HarmerDepartment of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
Warneford Hospital · GBOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S003037/1Wellcome Trust 102176/Z/13/ZWellcome Trust 216452/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe burden of depressive disorder is large and new treatment approaches are required. Repurposing widely available drugs such as statins may be a time- and cost-effective solution. Statins have anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties which have been shown to be relevant to the pathophysiology of depression. This study assesses the efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety of statins in major depressive disorder.

methodsOur study is an update and extension of a previous meta-analysis published in 2016 by Salagre et al. We performed a systematic review (PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, ISI Web of Science, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov until the 1st September 2020) and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using any statin against placebo or any other statin in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Our primary efficacy outcome measure was the mean value on any standardized scale for depressive symptoms at 8 weeks of treatment. We also calculated outcomes for efficacy, response, and remission at 2, 4, and 12 weeks, as well as acceptability (dropouts for any cause), tolerability (dropouts due to any adverse event), and safety (any adverse event) outcomes at the studies' endpoints. Furthermore, we conducted an exploratory network meta-analysis for the primary efficacy outcome to identify potential differences between statins.

resultsWe retrieved five randomized controlled trials meeting our inclusion criteria: four used a statin in addition to an antidepressant and compared it to placebo plus antidepressant, and one compared two statins alone. and one comparing one statin with another. Statins compared to placebo in addition to antidepressants were efficacious at 8 weeks (N = 255, SMD = -0.48, 95% CI = -0.74 to -0. 22) and 12 weeks (N = 134, SMD = -0.47, 95% CI = -0.89 to -0.05, moderate certainty) with no difference for acceptability, tolerability, and safety (low certainty). An exploratory network meta-analysis suggested that the most lipophilic statins, especially simvastatin, could be more efficacious than less lipophilic or hydrophilic molecules.

conclusionsThis systematic review suggests the efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety of statins in addition to antidepressants in patients with major depressive disorder. Further clinical trials in different settings are required to test this result. TRIAL RGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration: CRD42020170938.

Indexed as

Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMajor Depressive DisorderRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntidepressive AgentsHumansTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID33784356
PMCPMC8009386
OpenAlexW3145353625

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.