ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2021
Energy features in spontaneous up and down oscillations.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detailed study of bifurcations in a rate model with excitatory and inhibitory neurons and adaptation.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- Dynamic mode decomposition of resting-state fMRI revealing abnormal brain region features in schizophrenia.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Energy and synchronization between two neurons with nonlinear coupling.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Energy dependence of synchronization mode transitions in the delay-coupled FitzHugh-Nagumo system driven by chaotic activity.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Dopamine-Mediated Major Depressive Disorder in the Neural Circuit of Ventral Tegmental Area-Nucleus Accumbens-Medial Prefrontal Cortex: From Biological Evidence to Computational Models.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022Article
- Biophysical mechanism of the interaction between default mode network and working memory network.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous brain activities consume most of the brain's energy. So if we want to understand how the brain operates, we must take into account these spontaneous activities. Up and down transitions of membrane potentials are considered to be one of significant spontaneous activities. This kind of oscillation always shows bistable and bimodal distribution of membrane potentials. Our previous theoretical studies on up and down oscillations mainly looked at the ion channel dynamics. In this paper, we focus on energy feature of spontaneous up and down transitions based on a network model and its simulation. The simulated results indicate that the energy is a robust index and distinguishable of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. Meanwhile, one the whole, energy consumption of neurons shows bistable feature and bimodal distribution as well as the membrane potential, which turns out that the indicator of energy consumption encodes up and down states in this spontaneous activity. In detail, energy consumption mainly occurs during up states temporally, and mostly concentrates inside neurons rather than synapses spatially. The stimulation related energy is small, indicating that energy consumption is not driven by external stimulus, but internal spontaneous activity. This point of view is also consistent with brain imaging results. Through the observation and analysis of the findings, we prove the validity of the model again, and we can further explore the energy mechanism of more spontaneous activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.