Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33788151›Full record

ReviewCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2021

The role of tumor-associated macrophages in osteosarcoma progression - therapeutic implications.

Qingshan Huang, Xin Liang, Tingting Ren, Yi Huang, Hongliang Zhang, Yiyang Yu, Chenglong Chen, Wei Wang, Jianfang Niu, Jingbing Lou and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Qingshan HuangMusculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xin LiangMusculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Tingting RenMusculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yi HuangMusculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hongliang ZhangMusculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yiyang YuMusculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chenglong ChenMusculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wei WangMusculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jianfang NiuMusculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jingbing LouMusculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wei GuoMusculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China. bonettumor@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2133-9543
Peking University · CN

Funding

Beijing Science and Technology Planning Project Z161100000116100National Natural Science Foundation of China 81572633National Natural Science Foundation of China 82072970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary malignant bone tumor. Compared with previous treatment modalities, such as amputation, more recent comprehensive treatment modalities based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with limb salvage surgery have improved the survival rates of patients. Osteosarcoma treatment has, however, not further improved in recent years. Therefore, attention has shifted to the tumor microenvironment (TME) in which osteosarcoma cells are embedded. Therapeutic targets in the TME may be key to improving osteosarcoma treatment. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are the most common immune cells within the TME. TAMs in osteosarcoma may account for over 50% of the immune cells, and may play important roles in tumorigenesis, angiogenesis, immunosuppression, drug resistance and metastasis. Knowledge on the role of TAMs in the development, progression and treatment of osteosarcoma is gradually improving, although different or even opposing opinions still remain.

conclusionsTAMs may participate in the malignant progression of osteosarcoma through self-polarization, the promotion of blood vessel and lymphatic vessel formation, immunosuppression, and drug resistance. Besides, various immune checkpoint proteins expressed on the surface of TAMs, such as PD-1 and CD47, provide the possibility of the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Several clinical trials have been carried out and/or are in progress. Mifamotide and the immune checkpoint inhibitor Camrelizumab were both found to be effective in prolonging progression-free survival. Thus, TAMs may serve as attractive therapeutic targets. Targeting TAMs as a complementary therapy is expected to improve the prognosis of osteosarcoma. Further efforts may be made to identify potential beneficiaries of TAM-targeted therapies.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionHumansOsteosarcomaTumor-Associated MacrophagesTumor MicroenvironmentImmune checkpoint inhibitorsMifamurtideOsteosarcomaTAM polarizationTumor-associated macrophagesTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID33788151
PMCPMC12980758
OpenAlexW3193627594

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.