Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33789668›Full record

SynthesisJournal of translational medicine2021

High efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment in patients with comorbid migraine and depression: a meta-analysis.

Oreste Affatato, Thiago C Moulin, Claudia Pisanu, Victoria S Babasieva, Marco Russo, Elif I Aydinlar, Paola Torelli, Vladimir N Chubarev, Vadim V Tarasov, Helgi B Schiöth and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Psychopathological variables in chronic migraine patients with different therapeutic approach: psychological profile differences and impact on therapeutic efficacy in real life.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Pharmacogenetics in Primary Headache Disorders.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Oreste AffatatoDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden. oreste.affatato@neuro.uu.se.ORCID 0000-0001-5775-0185
Thiago C MoulinDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.
Claudia PisanuDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.
Victoria S BabasievaDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.
Marco RussoNeurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Elif I AydinlarDepartment of Neurology, Acibadem University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Paola TorelliHeadache Centre, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Vladimir N ChubarevDepartment of Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacy, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Vadim V TarasovDepartment of Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacy, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Helgi B SchiöthDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jessica MwinyiDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SESechenov University · RUAcıbadem University · TRAzienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · ITUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigraine and depression are highly prevalent and partly overlapping disorders that cause strong limitations in daily life. Patients tend to respond poorly to the therapies available for these diseases. OnabotulinumtoxinA has been proven to be an effective treatment for both migraine and depression. While many studies have addressed the effect of onabotulinumtoxinA in migraine or depression separately, a growing body of evidence suggests beneficial effects also for patients comorbid with migraine and depression. The current meta-analysis systematically investigates to what extent onabotulinumtoxinA is efficient in migraineurs with depression.

methodsA systematic literature search was performed based on PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science from the earliest date till October [Formula: see text], 2020. Mean, standard deviation (SD) and sample size have been used to evaluate improvement in depressive symptoms and migraine using random-effects empirical Bayes model.

resultsOur search retrieved 259 studies, eight of which met the inclusion criteria. OnabotulinumtoxinA injections administered to patients with both chronic migraine and major depressive disorder led to mean reduction of [Formula: see text] points (CI [[Formula: see text]], [Formula: see text]) in the BDI scale, of [Formula: see text] points (CI [[Formula: see text]], [Formula: see text]) in the BDI-II scale and of [Formula: see text] points (CI [[Formula: see text]], [Formula: see text]) in the PHQ-9 scale, when evaluating depressive symptoms. In the case of the migraine-related symptoms, we found mean reductions of [Formula: see text] (CI [[Formula: see text]], [Formula: see text]) points in the HIT6 scale, [Formula: see text] (CI [[Formula: see text]], [Formula: see text]) in the MIDAS scale, [Formula: see text] (CI [[Formula: see text]], [Formula: see text]) points in the VAS scale and of [Formula: see text] (CI [[Formula: see text]], [Formula: see text]) migraine episodes per month. Comorbid patients showed slightly better improvements in BDI, HIT6 scores and migraine frequency compared to monomorbid patients. The latter group manifested better results in MIDAS and VAS scores.

conclusionTreatment with onabotulinumtoxinA leads to a significant reduction of disease severity of both chronic migraine and major depressive disorder in patients comorbid with both diseases. Comparative analyses suggest an equivalent strong effect in monomorbid and comorbid patients, with beneficial effects specifically seen for certain migraine features.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type AMajor Depressive DisorderMigraine DisordersBayes TheoremChronic DiseaseDepressionHumansTreatment OutcomeBotulinum Toxins, Type ABotoxDepressionMeta-analysisMigraineOnabotulinumtoxinA

Identifiers

PMID33789668
PMCPMC8011097
OpenAlexW3110928807

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.