Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33789739›Full record

ArticleArchives of physiotherapy2021

The yield and usefulness of PAIN

Vanitha Arumugam, Joy C MacDermid, Dave Walton, Ruby Grewal

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of physiotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01348802 (A Randomized Trial Comparing "Push" Versus "Pull" Technology for Mobilizing Pain Evidence Into Practice Across Different Health Professions), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01348802 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Trial Comparing "Push" Versus "Pull" Technology for Mobilizing Pain Evidence Into Practice Across Different Health Professions

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2011 to 2015Enrolled675ConditionsPainArmsPush + Pull, Pull
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vanitha ArumugamPhysiotherapist, St. Joseph's Health Centre, London, Ontario, Canada. vanithaphysio@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2704-4655
Joy C MacDermidHand and Upper Limb Centre Clinical Research Laboratory, St. Joseph's Health Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
Dave WaltonSchool of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Ruby GrewalHand and Upper Limb Centre Clinical Research Laboratory, St. Joseph's Health Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

McMaster University (CIHR): CIHR - FRN: 107539 & FRN: 123308.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPAIN PURPOSE: The primary purpose of the study was to compare yield and usefulness of PubMed and PAIN STUDY

designTwo-phase double blinded randomized crossover trial.

methodsClinicians (n = 76) who were exposed to PAIN

resultsMultidisciplinary scenario: Overall, the participants had an overall one-page yield of 715 articles for PAIN

conclusionClinicians from different disciplines find both PAIN

trial registrationRegistered with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01348802 , Date: May 5, 2011.

Indexed as

Abstract codingDescriptive classificationPAIN+Perceived usefulnessPreferencePubMed

Identifiers

PMID33789739
PMCPMC8015066

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.