Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33797774›Full record

ReviewImmunology and cell biology2021

Making the most of high-dimensional cytometry data.

Felix Md Marsh-Wakefield, Andrew J Mitchell, Samuel E Norton, Thomas Myles Ashhurst, Julia Kh Leman, Joanna M Roberts, Jessica E Harte, Helen M McGuire, Roslyn A Kemp

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunology and cell biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Felix Md Marsh-WakefieldVascular Immunology Unit, Discipline of Pathology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Andrew J MitchellDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Materials Characterisation and Fabrication Platform, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Samuel E NortonNanix Ltd, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Thomas Myles AshhurstCharles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7269-7773
Julia Kh LemanDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Joanna M RobertsFlowjoanna Tapui Ltd, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Jessica E HarteDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Helen M McGuireCharles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2047-6543
Roslyn A KempDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9092-1150
The University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Otago · NZDunedin Public Hospital · NZPalmerston North Hospital · NZThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-dimensional cytometry represents an exciting new era of immunology research, enabling the discovery of new cells and prediction of patient responses to therapy. A plethora of analysis and visualization tools and programs are now available for both new and experienced users; however, the transition from low- to high-dimensional cytometry requires a change in the way users think about experimental design and data analysis. Data from high-dimensional cytometry experiments are often underutilized, because of both the size of the data and the number of possible combinations of markers, as well as to a lack of understanding of the processes required to generate meaningful data. In this article, we explain the concepts behind designing high-dimensional cytometry experiments and provide considerations for new and experienced users to design and carry out high-dimensional experiments to maximize quality data collection.

Indexed as

Flow CytometryHumansAnalysisexperimental designflow cytometryhigh-dimensional datamass cytometry

Identifiers

PMID33797774
PMCPMC8453896
OpenAlexW3139662382

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.