Evidence mapPaperPMID 33800710Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Systemic Administration of G-CSF Accelerates Bone Regeneration and Modulates Mobilization of Progenitor Cells in a Rat Model of Distraction Osteogenesis.

Flavy Roseren, Martine Pithioux, Stéphane Robert, Laure Balasse, Benjamin Guillet, Edouard Lamy, Sandrine Roffino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bio-OssFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The effect of intermittent parathyroid hormone on bone lengthening: current evidence to inform future effective interventions.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. A new osteogenic protein isolated fromBioactive materials · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Flavy RoserenISM, CNRS, Aix Marseille University, 13009 Marseille, France.
Martine PithiouxISM, CNRS, Aix Marseille University, 13009 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5283-3504
Stéphane RobertAMUTICYT, C2VN, INRAE, INSERM, Aix Marseille University, 13005 Marseille, France.
Laure BalasseC2VN, CERIMED, Aix Marseille University, 13005 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2057-7408
Benjamin GuilletC2VN, CERIMED, Aix Marseille University, 13005 Marseille, France.
Edouard LamyISM, CNRS, Aix Marseille University, 13009 Marseille, France.
Sandrine RoffinoISM, CNRS, Aix Marseille University, 13009 Marseille, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was shown to promote bone regeneration and mobilization of vascular and osteogenic progenitor cells. In this study, we investigated the effects of a systemic low dose of G-CSF on both bone consolidation and mobilization of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs), endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in a rat model of distraction osteogenesis (DO). Neovascularization and mineralization were longitudinally monitored using positron emission tomography and planar scintigraphy. Histological analysis was performed and the number of circulating HSPCs, EPCs and MSCs was studied by flow cytometry. Contrary to control group, in the early phase of consolidation, a bony bridge with lower osteoclast activity and a trend of an increase in osteoblast activity were observed in the distracted callus in the G-CSF group, whereas, at the late phase of consolidation, a significantly lower neovascularization was observed. While no difference was observed in the number of circulating EPCs between control and G-CSF groups, the number of MSCs was significantly lower at the end of the latency phase and that of HSPCs was significantly higher 4 days after the bone lengthening. Our results indicate that G-CSF accelerates bone regeneration and modulates mobilization of progenitor cells during DO.

Indexed as

Osteogenesis, DistractionAnimalsBone RegenerationDisease Models, AnimalDurapatiteFlow CytometryGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHematopoietic Stem Cell MobilizationKineticsMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsNeovascularization, PhysiologicOsteoblastsOsteoclastsPositron-Emission TomographyRatsDurapatiteGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factorbone formationendothelial progenitor cellsG-CSFhematopoietic stem/progenitor cellsmesenchymal stromal cellsneovascularization

Identifiers

PMID33800710
PMCPMC8037338
OpenAlexW3149242122

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.