ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021
Aortic Valve Disease and Associated Complex CAD: The Interventional Approach.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-Occurrence of Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Artery Disease: Facing Challenges Before, During, and After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Innovative pathways in revascularization for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome.JTCVS open · 2024Article
- "One-stop" interventional therapy for quadricuspid aortic valve combined with severe coronary artery disease: a case report.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, Type 2 Diabetes and Progression of Aortic Stenosis: The RED-CARPET Heart Valve Subgroup Cohort Study.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Coronary calcifications, the Achilles heel in coronary interventions.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2024Review
- Ultra-low radiation dose and contrast volume CT protocol and TAVI-CT score for TAVI planning and outcome.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Feasibility and Comparison of Resting Full-Cycle Ratio and Computed Tomography Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients with Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is highly prevalent in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). The management of CAD is a central aspect of the work-up of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), but few data are available on this field and the best percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) practice is yet to be determined. A major challenge is the ability to elucidate the severity of bystander coronary stenosis independently of the severity of aortic valve stenosis and subsequent impact on blood flow. The prognostic role of CAD in patients undergoing TAVI is being still debated and the benefits and the best timing of PCI in this context are currently under evaluation. Additionally, PCI in the setting of advanced AS poses some technical challenges, due to the complex anatomy, risk of hemodynamic instability, and the increased risk of bleeding complications. This review aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the available literature on myocardial revascularization in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI. This work can assist the Heart Team in individualizing decisions about myocardial revascularization, taking into account available diagnostic tools as well as the risks and benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.