Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33804417›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Quantitative Dynamic

Christos Sachpekidis, Jessica C Hassel, Annette Kopp-Schneider, Uwe Haberkorn, Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christos SachpekidisClinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Jessica C HasselDepartment of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Annette Kopp-SchneiderDepartment of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Uwe HaberkornClinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-StraussClinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0338-9472
German Cancer Research Center · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of novel immune checkpoint inhibitors has led to unprecedented survival rates in advanced melanoma. At the same time, it has raised relevant challenges in the interpretation of treatment response by conventional imaging approaches. In the present prospective study, we explored the predictive role of quantitative, dynamic

Indexed as

18F-FDGcompartment modelingdynamic PET/CTfractal analysismetastatic melanomaPD-1 inhibitorspharmacokineticsSUV

Identifiers

PMID33804417
PMCPMC7957728
OpenAlexW3135232168

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.