ArticleCells2021
Genome-Wide Identification of U-To-C RNA Editing Events for Nuclear Genes in
Article in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of peach multiple organellar RNA editing factors reveals the roles of RNA editing in plant immunity.BMC plant biology · 2022Pooled it
- Can transcriptome size and off-target effects explain the contrasting evolution of mitochondrial vs nuclear RNA editing?Journal of evolutionary biology · 2025Article
- RNA editing generates mRNA isoforms with distinct stabilities that may expand the thermal tolerance of mRNA and proteins inZoological research · 2025Article
- Detection of Developmental Asexual Stage-Specific RNA Editing Events inMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Complete chloroplast genomes of Cerastium alpinum, C. arcticum and C. nigrescens: genome structures, comparative and phylogenetic analysis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The Genome-Wide Characterization of Alternative Splicing and RNA Editing in the Development ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Review
- Genome-Wide Analysis of Multiple Organellar RNA Editing Factor (MORF) Family in Kiwifruit (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- ADAR RNA editing on antisense RNAs results in apparent U-to-C base changes on overlapping sense transcripts.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Decoding RNA Editing Sites Through Transcriptome Analysis in Rice Under Alkaline Stress.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cytosine-to-Uridine (C-to-U) RNA editing involves the deamination phenomenon, which is observed in animal nucleus and plant organelles; however, it has been considered the U-to-C is confined to the organelles of limited non-angiosperm plant species. Although previous RNA-seq-based analysis implied U-to-C RNA editing events in plant nuclear genes, it has not been broadly accepted due to inadequate confirmatory analyses. Here we examined the U-to-C RNA editing in Arabidopsis tissues at different developmental stages of growth. In this study, the high-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of 12-day-old and 20-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings was performed, which enabled transcriptome-wide identification of RNA editing sites to analyze differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and nucleotide base conversions. The results showed that DEGs were expressed to higher levels in 12-day-old seedlings than in 20-day-old seedlings. Additionally, pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) genes were also expressed at higher levels, as indicated by the log
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.