Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33809803›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Muscle Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Molecular Pathways Related to Oxidative Phosphorylation, Antioxidant Defense, Fatness and Growth in Mangalitsa and Moravka Pigs.

Yolanda Núñez, Čedomir Radović, Radomir Savić, Juan M García-Casco, Marjeta Čandek-Potokar, Rita Benítez, Dragan Radojković, Miloš Lukić, Marija Gogić, María Muñoz and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Changes inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Yolanda NúñezDepartamento de Mejora Genética Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Čedomir RadovićInstitute for Animal Husbandry, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-1800-2448
Radomir SavićFaculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0003-2131-5303
Juan M García-CascoDepartamento de Mejora Genética Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Marjeta Čandek-PotokarAgricultural Institute of Slovenia (KIS), 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-0231-126X
Rita BenítezDepartamento de Mejora Genética Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7459-2836
Dragan RadojkovićFaculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia.
Miloš LukićInstitute for Animal Husbandry, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia.
Marija GogićInstitute for Animal Husbandry, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-8121-4649
María MuñozDepartamento de Mejora Genética Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7018-6977
Luca FontanesiDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7050-3760
Cristina ÓviloDepartamento de Mejora Genética Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5738-8435
Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria · ESInstitute for Animal Husbandry · RSUniversity of Belgrade · RSAgricultural institute of Slovenia · SIUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 634476Slovenian Research Agency P4-0133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work was aimed at evaluating loin transcriptome and metabolic pathway differences between the two main Serbian local pig breeds with divergent characteristics regarding muscle growth and fatness, as well as exploring nutrigenomic effects of tannin supplementation in Mangalitsa (MA) pigs. The study comprised 24 Mangalitsa and 10 Moravka (MO) males, which were kept under identical management conditions. Mangalitsa animals were divided in two nutritional groups (n = 12) receiving a standard (control) or tannin-supplemented diet (1.5%; MAT). Moravka pigs were fed the standard mixture. All animals were slaughtered at a similar age; 120 kg of average live weight (LW) and loin tissue was used for RNA-seq analysis. Results showed 306 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) according to breed, enriched in genes involved in growth, lipid metabolism, protein metabolism and muscle development, such as

Indexed as

MangalitsaMoravkamusclenutrigenomicspigtanninstranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID33809803
PMCPMC8002519
OpenAlexW3138532824

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.