Evidence mapPaperPMID 33810376Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Instrument Context Relevance Evaluation, Translation, and Psychometric Testing of the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-Revised (DEPS-R) among People with Type 1 Diabetes in China.

Wencong Lv, Qinyi Zhong, Jia Guo, Jiaxin Luo, Jane Dixon, Robin Whittemore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wencong LvClinical Nursing Department, Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
Qinyi ZhongClinical Nursing Department, Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
Jia GuoClinical Nursing Department, Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
Jiaxin LuoClinical Nursing Department, Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
Jane DixonSchool of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Robin WhittemoreSchool of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001863 · YALE UNIVERSITY · 2025 to 2025
$9.9M
New York Regional Center for Diabetes Translation ResearchP30DK111022 · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · 2025 to 2025
$810k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK111022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with type 1 diabetes are susceptible to disordered eating behaviors. The American Diabetes Association recommends using the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-Revised (DEPS-R) to screen them. There is no validated diabetes-specific screening measure in China. The objectives were to adapt DEPS-R into Mandarin Chinese and to test its psychometric properties among youths and adults with type 1 diabetes in China, respectively.

methodsThis study was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 included context relevance evaluation and instrument translation. Phase 2 was psychometric testing of reliability and construct validity among 89 youths (8~17 years old) and 61 adults with type 1 diabetes.

resultThe Context Relevance Index and Translation Validity Index of this instrument were good. Strong internal consistency reliability correlations and convergent validity were demonstrated among youths and adults. DISCUSSION: The Chinese version of the DEPS-R is a valid and reliable tool for screening disordered eating behaviors in Chinese youths and adults with type 1 diabetes. The Context Relevance Index is advocated to evaluate the difference between the context in which an instrument was originally developed and the target context.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1AdolescentAdultChinaHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairescontext relevancediabetes eating problem survey-revisedinstrument translationpsychometric propertytype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID33810376
PMCPMC8037186

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.