Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33818518›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2021

Transcriptome analysis of molecular mechanisms underlying facial nerve injury repair in rats.

Qian-Qian Cao, Shuo Li, Yan Lu, Di Wu, Wei Feng, Yong Shi, Lu-Ping Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Dual role of complement in neuronal repair.Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qian-Qian CaoKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Shuo LiDepartment of Otolaryngology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Yan LuKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Di WuDepartment of Otolaryngology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Wei FengKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Yong ShiDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lu-Ping ZhangDepartment of Otolaryngology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Nantong University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Nantong University · CNFudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the transcriptional alterations inside the facial nucleus after facial nerve injury have been well studied, the gene expression changes in the facial nerve trunk after injury are still unknown. In this study, we established an adult rat model of facial nerve crush injury by compressing the right lateral extracranial nerve trunk. Transcriptome sequencing, differential gene expression analysis, and cluster analysis of the injured facial nerve trunk were performed, and 39 intersecting genes with significant variance in expression were identified. Gene Ontology annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analyses of the 39 intersecting genes revealed that these genes are mostly involved in leukocyte cell-cell adhesion and phagocytosis and have essential roles in regulating nerve repair. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assays were used to validate the expression of pivotal genes. Finally, nine pivotal genes that contribute to facial nerve recovery were identified, including Arhgap30, Akr1b8, C5ar1, Csf2ra, Dock2, Hcls1, Inpp5d, Sla, and Spi1. Primary Schwann cells were isolated from the sciatic nerve of neonatal rats. After knocking down Akr1b8 in Schwann cells with an Akr1b8-specific small interfering RNA plasmid, expression levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and interleukin-6 were decreased, while cell proliferation and migration were not obviously altered. These findings suggest that Akr1b8 likely regulates the interaction between Schwann cells and macrophages through regulation of cytokine expression to promote facial nerve regeneration. This study is the first to reveal a transcriptome change in the facial nerve trunk after facial nerve injury, thereby revealing the potential mechanism underlying repair of facial nerve injury. This study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Nantong University, China in 2018 (approval No. S20180923-007).

Indexed as

Akr1b8cell proliferationfacial nerve injuryGene-Act Networksinflammatory responseRNA-SeqSchwann cellstranscriptomics analysis

Identifiers

PMID33818518
PMCPMC8354104
OpenAlexW3144067125

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.