Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33823935›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

Developing a complex intervention whilst considering implementation: the TANDEM (Tailored intervention for ANxiety and DEpression Management) intervention for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Liz Steed, Karen Heslop-Marshall, Ratna Sohanpal, Sarah Saqi-Waseem, Moira Kelly, Hilary Pinnock, Stephanie Taylor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. IMPImplementation science communications · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Correlation of Serum IL-18, BDNF, and IL-1Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Liz SteedInstitute for Population Health Sciences, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK. e.a.steed@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1926-3196
Karen Heslop-MarshallNewcastle upon Tyne NHS Hospitals Foundation Trust, Chest Clinic, New Victoria Wing RVI Hospital, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK.
Ratna SohanpalInstitute for Population Health Sciences, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK.
Sarah Saqi-WaseemUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, NW1 2PG, London, UK.
Moira KellyInstitute for Population Health Sciences, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK.
Hilary PinnockAllergy and Respiratory Research Group, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Doorway 3, Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
Stephanie TaylorInstitute for Population Health Sciences, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK.
Queen Mary University of London · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Health Technology Assessment Programme 13/146/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidelines now call for a thorough and comprehensive description of the development of healthcare interventions to aid evaluation and understanding of the processes of change. This was the primary aim of this study but we also recognised that effective interventions are commonly not implemented in clinical practice. It is suggested that insufficient attention is given to the implementation process at the development phase of interventions. This study outlines the 5 step iterative process we adopted for considering both implementation and effectiveness issues from the outset of intervention development. We use the development of a complex intervention Tailored intervention for ANxiety and DEpression Management (TANDEM) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to illustrate this process.

methodsIntervention development built upon the Medical Research Council framework for developing complex interventions and the person-based approach for development of behavioural interventions. Building an expert team, specifying theory, qualitative data collection and pre-piloting were all critical steps in our intervention development and are described here.

resultsContact with experts in the field, and explicitly building on previous work, ensured efficiency of design. Qualitative work suggested guiding principles for the intervention such as introducing mood in relation to breathlessness, and providing flexible tailoring to patients' needs, whilst implementation principles focused on training selected respiratory professionals and requiring supervision to ensure standards of care. Subsequent steps of intervention development, pre-piloting and intervention refinement led to an intervention that was deemed acceptable and if successful will be ready for implementation.

conclusionsThe TANDEM study was developed efficiently by building on previous work and considering implementation issues from the outset, with the aim that if shown to be effective it will have more rapid translation in to the health care system with accelerated patient benefits.

trial registrationISRCTN ISRCTN59537391 . Registered on 20 March 2017. Protocol version 6.0, 22 April 2018.

Indexed as

DepressionPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAnxietyAnxiety DisordersDyspneaHumansAnxietyChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)DepressionImplementationIntervention developmentSelf-management

Identifiers

PMID33823935
PMCPMC8025339
OpenAlexW3118505542

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.