Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33824591›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2021

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Remediate Age-Related Cognitive Decline in Healthy Older Adults.

Aprinda Indahlastari, Cheshire Hardcastle, Alejandro Albizu, Stacey Alvarez-Alvarado, Emanuel M Boutzoukas, Nicole D Evangelista, Hanna K Hausman, Jessica Kraft, Kailey Langer, Adam J Woods

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Alcohol Use Disorder and Dementia: A Review.Alcohol research : current reviews · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aprinda IndahlastariCenter for Cognitive Aging and Memory, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5994-5514
Cheshire HardcastleCenter for Cognitive Aging and Memory, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Alejandro AlbizuCenter for Cognitive Aging and Memory, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2727-6616
Stacey Alvarez-AlvaradoCenter for Cognitive Aging and Memory, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Emanuel M BoutzoukasCenter for Cognitive Aging and Memory, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Nicole D EvangelistaCenter for Cognitive Aging and Memory, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Hanna K HausmanCenter for Cognitive Aging and Memory, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9694-9760
Jessica KraftCenter for Cognitive Aging and Memory, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Kailey LangerCenter for Cognitive Aging and Memory, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1588-1635
Adam J WoodsCenter for Cognitive Aging and Memory, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
University of Florida Health · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
Augmenting Cognitive Training in Older Adults - The ACT GrantR01AG054077 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI COHEN, RONALD A, MARSISKE, MICHAEL · 2016 to 2020
$6.9M
Research Training in Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Cognition in Aging, MCI, and Alzheimer's DiseaseT32AG020499 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MARSISKE, MICHAEL, SMITH, GLENN E. · 2003 to 2024
$3.7M
Breathing Research and Therapeutics (BREATHE)T32HL134621 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Gordon S. Mitchell · 2017 to 2026
$3.4M
Clinical and Translational Predoctoral training in Alzheimers Disease and Related DementiasT32AG061892 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PARAMITA CHAKRABARTY, JADA M LEWIS · 2018 to 2026
$1.8M
Neuromodulation of Cognition in Older AdultsK01AG050707 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI WOODS, ADAM J. · 2016 to 2020
$613k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL134621NIA NIH HHS K01 AG050707NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054077NIA NIH HHS T32 AG020499NIA NIH HHS T32 AG061892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been proposed as a possible method for remediating age-associated cognitive decline in the older adult population. While tDCS has shown potential for improving cognitive functions in healthy older adults, stimulation outcomes on various cognitive domains have been mixed.

methodsA systematic search was performed in four databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PsychInfo. Search results were then screened for eligibility based on inclusion/exclusion criteria to only include studies where tDCS was applied to improve cognition in healthy older adults 65 years and above. Eligible studies were reviewed and demographic characteristics, tDCS dose parameters, study procedures, and cognitive outcomes were extracted. Reported effect sizes for active compared to sham group in representative cognitive domain were converted to Hedges' g. MAIN

resultsA total of thirteen studies involving healthy older adults (n=532, mean age=71.2+5.3 years) were included in the meta-analysis. The majority of included studies (94%) targeted the prefrontal cortex with stimulation intensity 1-2 mA using various electrode placements with anodes near the frontal region. Across all studies, we found Hedges' g values ranged from -0.31 to 1.85 as reported group effect sizes of active stimulation compared to sham.

conclusionWhile observed outcomes varied, overall findings indicated promising effects of tDCS to remediate cognitive aging and thus deserves further exploration. Future characterization of inter-individual variability in tDCS dose response and applications in larger cohorts are warranted to further validate benefits of tDCS for cognition in healthy older adults.

Indexed as

agingcognitive declinetDCStES

Identifiers

PMID33824591
PMCPMC8018377
OpenAlexW3148929485

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.