Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33829064›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2021

Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes in Cervical Cancer Patients by Comparative Transcriptome Analysis.

Annapurna S D, Deepthi Pasumarthi, Akbar Pasha, Ravinder Doneti, Sheela B, Mahendran Botlagunta, Vijaya Lakshmi B, Smita C Pawar

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Annapurna S DDepartment of Genetics, University College of Science, Osmania University, Hyderabad, 500 007 Telangana, India.
Deepthi PasumarthiDepartment of Genetics, University College of Science, Osmania University, Hyderabad, 500 007 Telangana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2185-0883
Akbar PashaDepartment of Genetics, University College of Science, Osmania University, Hyderabad, 500 007 Telangana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7317-4800
Ravinder DonetiDepartment of Genetics, University College of Science, Osmania University, Hyderabad, 500 007 Telangana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1262-186X
Sheela BMNJ Institute of Oncology & Regional Cancer Center, Red Hills, Hyderabad, 500004 Telangana, India.
Mahendran BotlaguntaDepartment of Indo American Cancer Research Foundation, Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Vijaya Lakshmi BInstitute of Genetics and Hospital for Genetic Diseases, Osmania University, Begumpet, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Smita C PawarDepartment of Genetics, University College of Science, Osmania University, Hyderabad, 500 007 Telangana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7667-0372
Osmania University · INBasavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute · INInstitute of Genetics and Hospital for Genetic Diseases · INMNJ Institute Of Oncology and Regional Cancer Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is one of the most malignant reproductive diseases seen in women worldwide. The identification of dysregulated genes in clinical samples of cervical cancer may pave the way for development of better prognostic markers and therapeutic targets. To identify the dysregulated genes (DEGs), we have retrospectively collected 10 biopsies, seven from cervical cancer patients and three from normal subjects who underwent a hysterectomy. Total RNA isolated from biopsies was subjected to microarray analysis using the human Clariom D Affymetrix platform. Based on the results of principal component analysis (PCA), only eight samples are qualified for further studies; GO and KEGG were used to identify the key genes and were compared with TCGA and GEO datasets. Identified genes were further validated by quantitative real-time PCR and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and the highest Youden index was calculated in order to evaluate cutoff points (COPs) that allowed distinguishing of tissue samples of cervical squamous carcinoma patients from those of healthy individuals. By comparative microarray analysis, a total of 108 genes common across the six patients' samples were chosen; among these, 78 genes were upregulated and 26 genes were downregulated. The key genes identified were SPP1, LYN, ARRB2, COL6A3, FOXM1, CCL21, TTK, and MELK. Based on their relative expression, the genes were ordered as follows: TTK > ARRB2 > SPP1 > FOXM1 > LYN > MELK > CCL21 > COL6A3; this generated data is in sync with the TCGA datasets, except for ARRB2. Protein-protein interaction network analysis revealed that TTK and MELK are closely associated with SMC4, AURKA, PLK4, and KIF18A. The candidate genes SPP1, FOXM1, LYN, COL6A3, CCL21, TTK and MELK at mRNA level, emerge as promising candidate markers for cervical cancer prognosis and also emerge as potential therapeutic drug targets.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticCell Line, TumorDatabases, GeneticData MiningFemaleHumansPrincipal Component AnalysisProtein Interaction MapsReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveTranscriptomeUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID33829064
PMCPMC8004372
OpenAlexW3138340894

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.