Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33837783›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2021

Serum Inflammation-based Scores in Endocrine Tumors.

Pedro Marques, Friso de Vries, Olaf M Dekkers, Márta Korbonits, Nienke R Biermasz, Alberto M Pereira

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effects of personalized vitamin DBritish journal of cancer · 2026
    Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Inflammation-based Scores in Patients With Pheochromocytoma.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pedro MarquesDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden (CETL), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4959-5725
Friso de VriesDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden (CETL), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3660-6093
Olaf M DekkersDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden (CETL), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1333-7580
Márta KorbonitsCentre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4101-9432
Nienke R BiermaszDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden (CETL), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5817-3594
Alberto M PereiraDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden (CETL), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1194-9866
Leiden University Medical Center · NLQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M018539/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextSerum inflammation-based scores reflect systemic inflammatory response and/or patients' nutritional status, and may predict clinical outcomes in cancer. While these are well-described and increasingly used in different cancers, their clinical usefulness in the management of patients with endocrine tumors is less known. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A comprehensive PubMed search was performed using the terms "endocrine tumor," "inflammation," "serum inflammation-based score," "inflammatory-based score," "inflammatory response-related scoring," "systemic inflammatory response markers," "neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio," "neutrophil-to-platelet ratio," "lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio," "Glasgow prognostic score," "neutrophil-platelet score," "Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index," and "Prognostic Nutrition Index" in clinical studies. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio are the ones most extensively investigated in patients with endocrine tumors. Other scores have also been considered in some studies. Several studies focused in finding whether serum inflammatory biomarkers may stratify the endocrine tumor patients' risk and detect those at risk for developing more aggressive and/or refractory disease, particularly after endocrine surgery.

conclusionsIn this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the different serum inflammation-based scores and their usefulness in predicting the phenotype, clinical aggressiveness, and disease outcomes and prognosis in patients with endocrine tumors. The value of such serum inflammation-based scores in the management of patients with endocrine tumors has been emerging over the last decade. However, further research is necessary to establish useful markers and their cut-offs for routine clinical practice for individual diseases.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques, EndocrineBiomarkers, TumorEndocrine Gland NeoplasmsHumansInflammationPrognosisResearch DesignBiomarkers, Tumorendocrine tumorlymphocyte-to-monocyte rationeutrophil-to-lymphocyte rationeutrophil-to-platelet ratioserum inflammation-based scoresystemic immune-inflammation index

Identifiers

PMID33837783
PMCPMC8475227
OpenAlexW3149441764

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.