Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33838014›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2021

Clinical significance of CDKN2A homozygous deletion in combination with methylated MGMT status for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma.

Yusuke Funakoshi, Nobuhiro Hata, Kosuke Takigawa, Hideyuki Arita, Daisuke Kuga, Ryusuke Hatae, Yuhei Sangatsuda, Yutaka Fujioka, Aki Sako, Toru Umehara and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Loss ofJournal of Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Clinical and VASARI Features to PredictAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Genomic Profiling in Glioma Patients to Explore Clinically Relevant Markers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Biomedicines · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  17. Insights into the Peritumoural Brain Zone of Glioblastoma:International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yusuke FunakoshiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Nobuhiro HataDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5523-7166
Kosuke TakigawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hideyuki AritaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.
Daisuke KugaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Ryusuke HataeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yuhei SangatsudaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yutaka FujiokaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Aki SakoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Toru UmeharaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.
Tadamasa YoshitakeDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Osamu TogaoDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Akio HiwatashiDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Koji YoshimotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Toru IwakiDepartment of Neuropathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Masahiro MizoguchiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kyushu University · JPThe University of Osaka · JPKagoshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAccumulating evidence from recent molecular diagnostic studies has indicated the prognostic significance of various genetic markers for patients with glioblastoma (GBM). To evaluate the impact of such genetic markers on prognosis, we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients with IDH-wildtype GBM in our institution. In addition, to assess the impact of bevacizumab (BEV) treatment, we compared overall survival (OS) between the pre- and post-BEV eras.

methodsWe analyzed the data of 100 adult patients (over 18 years old) with IDH-wildtype GBM from our database between February 2006 and October 2018. Genetic markers, such as MGMT methylation status, EGFR amplification, CDKN2A homozygous deletion, and clinical factors were analyzed by evaluating the patients' OS.

resultsCDKN2A homozygous deletion showed no significant impact on OS in patients with methylated MGMT status (p = 0.5268), whereas among patients with unmethylated MGMT status, there was a significant difference in OS between patients with and without CDKN2A homozygous deletion (median OS: 14.7 and 16.9 months, respectively, p = 0.0129). This difference was more evident in the pre-BEV era (median OS: 10.1 and 15.6 months, respectively, p = 0.0351) but has become nonsignificant in the post-BEV era (median OS: 16.0 and 16.9 months, respectively, p = 0.1010) due to OS improvement in patients with CDKN2A homozygous deletion. However, these findings could not be validated in The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort.

conclusionsMGMT and CDKN2A status subdivided our cohort into three race-specific groups with different prognoses. Our findings indicate that BEV approval in Japan led to OS improvement exclusively for patients with concurrent unmethylated MGMT status and CDKN2A homozygous deletion.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16DNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleGenetic MarkersGlioblastomaHomozygoteHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMaleMiddle AgedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBevacizumabCDKN2A protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16DNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesGenetic MarkersIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMGMT protein, humanTumor Suppressor ProteinsCDKN2AglioblastomaIDH-wildtypeMGMTsurvival

Identifiers

PMID33838014
PMCPMC8124111
OpenAlexW3147917020

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.