Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33838737›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Planetary health2021

Improved housing versus usual practice for additional protection against clinical malaria in The Gambia (RooPfs): a household-randomised controlled trial.

Margaret Pinder, John Bradley, Musa Jawara, Muna Affara, Lesong Conteh, Simon Correa, David Jeffries, Caroline Jones, Balla Kandeh, Jakob Knudsen and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Planetary health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. House modifications for preventing malaria.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Margaret PinderDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK; Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia.
John BradleyMRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Musa JawaraMedical Research Council Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia.
Muna AffaraMedical Research Council Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia; Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Lesong ContehLondon School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Simon CorreaMedical Research Council Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia.
David JeffriesMedical Research Council Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia.
Caroline JonesKEMRI-Wellcome Trust Programme, Kilifi, Kenya and Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Balla KandehNational Malaria Control Programme, Banjul, The Gambia.
Jakob KnudsenRoyal Danish Academy - Architecture, Design, Conservation, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Yekini OlatunjiMedical Research Council Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia.
Elisa SicuriSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Umberto D'AlessandroMedical Research Council Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia; Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Steve W LindsayDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK; Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Electronic address: s.w.lindsay@durham.ac.uk.
MRC Unit the Gambia · GMLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBBarcelona Institute for Global Health · ESDurham University · GBLondon School of Economics and Political Science · GBRoyal Danish Academy – Architecture, Design, Conservation · DKUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M007383/1Medical Research Council MR/R010161/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn malaria-endemic areas, residents of modern houses have less malaria than those living in traditional houses. We aimed to assess whether children in The Gambia received an incremental benefit from improved housing, where current best practice of insecticide-treated nets, indoor residual spraying, seasonal malaria chemoprevention in children younger than 5 years, and prompt treatment against clinical malaria was in place.

methodsIn this randomised controlled study, 800 households with traditional thatched-roofed houses were randomly selected from 91 villages in the Upper River Region of The Gambia. Within each village, equal numbers of houses were randomly allocated to the control and intervention groups using a sampling frame. Houses in the intervention group were modified with metal roofs and screened doors and windows, whereas houses in the control group received no modifications. In each group, clinical malaria in children aged 6 months to 13 years was monitored by active case detection over 2 years (2016-17). We did monthly collections from indoor light traps to estimate vector densities. Primary endpoints were the incidence of clinical malaria in study children with more than 50% of observations each year and household vector density. The trial is registered at ISRCTN02622179.

findingsIn June, 2016, 785 houses had one child each recruited into the study (398 in unmodified houses and 402 in modified houses). 26 children in unmodified houses and 28 children in modified houses did not have at least 50% of visits in a year and so were excluded from analysis. 38 children in unmodified houses were recruited after study commencement, as were 21 children in modified houses, meaning 410 children in unmodified houses and 395 in modified houses were included in the parasitological analyses. At the end of the study, 659 (94%) of 702 children were reported to have slept under an insecticide-treated net; 662 (88%) of 755 children lived in houses that received indoor residual spraying; and 151 (90%) of 168 children younger than 5 years had seasonal malaria chemoprevention. Incidence of clinical malaria was 0·12 episodes per child-year in children in the unmodified houses and 0·20 episodes per child-year in the modified houses (unadjusted incidence rate ratio [RR] 1·68 [95% CI 1·11-2·55], p=0·014). Household vector density was 3·30 Anopheles gambiae per house per night in the unmodified houses compared with 3·60 in modified houses (unadjusted RR 1·28 [0·87-1·89], p=0·21).

interpretationImproved housing did not provide protection against clinical malaria in this area of low seasonal transmission with high coverage of insecticide-treated nets, indoor residual spraying, and seasonal malaria chemoprevention.

fundingGlobal Health Trials funded by Medical Research Council, UK Department for International Development, and Wellcome Trust.

Indexed as

AnophelesMalariaAnimalsGambiaHousingHumansMosquito Vectors

Identifiers

PMID33838737
PMCPMC8051018
OpenAlexW3151159754

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.