Evidence mapPaperPMID 33842907Full record

Trial reportThe lancet. Healthy longevity2021

Effect of selenium supplementation on musculoskeletal health in older women: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Jennifer S Walsh, Richard M Jacques, Lutz Schomburg, Tom R Hill, John C Mathers, Graham R Williams, Richard Eastell

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The lancet. Healthy longevity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02832648 (The Effect of Selenium Supplementation on Musculoskeletal Health in Older Women Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02832648 phase3completednot on this map

The Effect of Selenium Supplementation on Musculoskeletal Health in Older Women Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustRan2017 to 2020Enrolled123ConditionsOsteoporosisArmsselenase (selenium)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Long-Term Selenium-Yeast Supplementation Does Not Affect Bone Turnover Markers: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2022
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The role of nutrition in the prevention of sarcopenia.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Role of Selenium in Pathologies: An Updated Review.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer S WalshMellanby Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Sheffield, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Richard M JacquesSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Lutz SchomburgInstitut für Experimentelle Endokrinologie, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Tom R HillHuman Nutrition Research Centre, Centre for Healthier Lives, Population Health Science Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
John C MathersHuman Nutrition Research Centre, Centre for Healthier Lives, Population Health Science Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Graham R WilliamsMolecular Endocrinology Laboratory, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Richard EastellMellanby Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Sheffield, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Newcastle University · GBNorthern General Hospital · GBImperial College London · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K006312/1Medical Research Council MR/L016354/1Medical Research Council MR/P020941/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObservational and preclinical studies show associations between selenium status, bone health, and physical function. Most adults in Europe have serum selenium below the optimum range. We hypothesised that selenium supplementation could reduce pro-resorptive actions of reactive oxygen species on osteoclasts and improve physical function.

methodsWe completed a 6-month randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. We recruited postmenopausal women older than 55 years with osteopenia or osteoporosis at the Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive selenite 200 μg, 50 μg, or placebo orally once per day. Medication was supplied to the site blinded and numbered by a block randomisation sequence with a block size of 18, and participants were allocated medication in numerical order. All participants and study team were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was urine N-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx, expressed as ratio to creatinine) at 26 weeks. Analysis included all randomly assigned participants who completed follow-up. Groups were compared with analysis of covariance with Hochberg testing. Secondary endpoints were other biochemical markers of bone turnover, bone mineral density, short physical performance battery, and grip strength. Mechanistic endpoints were glutathione peroxidase, highly sensitive C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6. This trial is registered with EU clinical trials, EudraCT 2016-002964-15, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02832648, and is complete.

findings120 participants were recruited between Jan 23, 2017, and April 11, 2018, and randomly assigned to selenite 200 μg, 50 μg, or placebo (n=40 per group). 115 (96%) of 120 participants completed follow-up and were included in the primary analysis (200 μg [n=39], 50 μg [n=39], placebo [n=37]). Median follow-up was 25·0 weeks (IQR 24·7-26·0). In the 200 μg group, mean serum selenium increased from 78·8 (95% CI 73·5-84·2) to 105·7 μg/L (99·5-111·9). Urine NTx to creatinine ratio (nmol bone collagen equivalent:mmol creatinine) did not differ significantly between treatment groups at 26 weeks: 40·5 (95% CI 34·9-47·0) for placebo, 43·4 (37·4-50·5) for 50 μg, and 42·2 (37·5-47·6) for 200 μg. None of the secondary or mechanistic endpoint measurements differed between treatment groups at 26 weeks. Seven (6%) of 120 participants were withdrawn from treatment at week 13 due to abnormal thyroid-stimulating hormone concentrations (one in the 200 μg group, three in the 50 μg group, and three in the placebo group) and abnormal blood glucose (one in the 50 μg group). There were three serious adverse events: a non-ST elevation myocardial infarction at week 18 (in the 50 μg group), a diagnosis of bowel cancer after routine population screening at week 2 (in the placebo group), and a pulmonary embolus due to metastatic bowel cancer at week 4 (in the 200 μg group). All severe adverse events were judged by the principal investigator as unrelated to trial medication.

interpretationSelenium supplementation at these doses does not affect musculoskeletal health in postmenopausal women.

fundingUK National Institute for Health Research Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsSeleniumAdultAgedCreatinineDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansSelenious AcidCreatinineSelenious AcidSelenium

Identifiers

PMID33842907
PMCPMC8020713
OpenAlexW3136869335

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.