Evidence mapPaperPMID 33843015Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2022

New antidiabetic therapy and HFpEF: light at the end of tunnel?

Marijana Tadic, Carla Sala, Sahrai Saeed, Guido Grassi, Giuseppe Mancia, Wolfang Rottbauer, Cesare Cuspidi

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. SGLT2 Inhibitors: New Hope for the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction?American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Marijana TadicKlinik Für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Albert-Einstein Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany. marijana_tadic@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6235-5152
Carla SalaDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milano and Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore IRCCS Policlinico Di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Sahrai SaeedDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Guido GrassiClinica Medica, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe ManciaMilano and Policlinico Di Monza, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Wolfang RottbauerKlinik Für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Albert-Einstein Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Cesare CuspidiClinica Medica, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
University of Milano-Bicocca · ITHaukeland University Hospital · NOIRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano · ITUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DEUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New antidiabetic therapy that includes sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists, and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors showed significant benefit on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus, and this was particularly confirmed for SGLT2 inhibitors in subjects with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Their role on patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is still not elucidated, but encouraging results coming from the clinical studies indicate their beneficial role. The role of GLP-1R agonists and particularly DPP-4 inhibitors is less clear and debatable. Findings from the meta-analyses are sending positive message about the use of GLP-1R agonists in HFrEF therapy and revealed the improvement of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function in HFpEF. Nevertheless, the relevant medical societies still consider their effect as neutral or insufficiently investigated in HF patients. The impact of DPP-4 inhibitors in HF is the most controversial due to conflicting data that range from negative impact and increased risk of hospitalization due to HF, throughout neutral effect, to beneficial influence on LV diastolic dysfunction. However, this is a very heterogeneous group of medications and some professional societies made clear discrepancy between saxagliptin that might increase risk of HF hospitalization and those DPP-4 inhibitors that have no effect on hospitalization. The aim of this review is to summarize current clinical evidence about the effect of new antidiabetic medications on LV diastolic function and their potential benefits in HFpEF patients.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsHeart FailureSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsVentricular Dysfunction, LeftHumansHypoglycemic AgentsStroke VolumeDipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsHypoglycemic AgentsSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsDiastolic functionDPP-4 inhibitorsGLP-1 receptor agonistsHeart failureLeft ventricularSGLT2 inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID33843015
PMCPMC9197886
OpenAlexW3154629999

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.