Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33844136›Full record

ReviewMolecular diversity2021

Artificial intelligence to deep learning: machine intelligence approach for drug discovery.

Rohan Gupta, Devesh Srivastava, Mehar Sahu, Swati Tiwari, Rashmi K Ambasta, Pravir Kumar

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular diversity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05858892 (Comparison of an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Rehabilitation Program for Shoulder Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Clinical Decision Making of Therapists), which is not on this map. Cited by 425 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
425citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05858892 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Rehabilitation Program for Shoulder Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Clinical Decision Making of Therapists

TypeobservationalSponsorTaipei Medical University Shuang Ho HospitalRan2022 to 2024Enrolled80ConditionsShoulder Musculoskeletal Disorders, Rehabilitation Programs, Machine LearningArmsusual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

425 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Drug-likeness prioritised selection identifies anti-Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. GSF-DTA: An Innovative Graph-Sequence Fusion Framework for Drug-Target Affinity Prediction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

365 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rohan Gupta *Molecular Neuroscience and Functional Genomics Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Delhi Technological University (Formerly DCE), Shahbad Daulatpur, Bawana Road, Delhi, 110042, India.
Devesh Srivastava *Molecular Neuroscience and Functional Genomics Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Delhi Technological University (Formerly DCE), Shahbad Daulatpur, Bawana Road, Delhi, 110042, India.
Mehar Sahu *Molecular Neuroscience and Functional Genomics Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Delhi Technological University (Formerly DCE), Shahbad Daulatpur, Bawana Road, Delhi, 110042, India.
Swati Tiwari *Molecular Neuroscience and Functional Genomics Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Delhi Technological University (Formerly DCE), Shahbad Daulatpur, Bawana Road, Delhi, 110042, India.
Rashmi K AmbastaMolecular Neuroscience and Functional Genomics Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Delhi Technological University (Formerly DCE), Shahbad Daulatpur, Bawana Road, Delhi, 110042, India.
Pravir KumarMolecular Neuroscience and Functional Genomics Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Delhi Technological University (Formerly DCE), Shahbad Daulatpur, Bawana Road, Delhi, 110042, India. pravirkumar@dtu.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7444-2344

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug designing and development is an important area of research for pharmaceutical companies and chemical scientists. However, low efficacy, off-target delivery, time consumption, and high cost impose a hurdle and challenges that impact drug design and discovery. Further, complex and big data from genomics, proteomics, microarray data, and clinical trials also impose an obstacle in the drug discovery pipeline. Artificial intelligence and machine learning technology play a crucial role in drug discovery and development. In other words, artificial neural networks and deep learning algorithms have modernized the area. Machine learning and deep learning algorithms have been implemented in several drug discovery processes such as peptide synthesis, structure-based virtual screening, ligand-based virtual screening, toxicity prediction, drug monitoring and release, pharmacophore modeling, quantitative structure-activity relationship, drug repositioning, polypharmacology, and physiochemical activity. Evidence from the past strengthens the implementation of artificial intelligence and deep learning in this field. Moreover, novel data mining, curation, and management techniques provided critical support to recently developed modeling algorithms. In summary, artificial intelligence and deep learning advancements provide an excellent opportunity for rational drug design and discovery process, which will eventually impact mankind. The primary concern associated with drug design and development is time consumption and production cost. Further, inefficiency, inaccurate target delivery, and inappropriate dosage are other hurdles that inhibit the process of drug delivery and development. With advancements in technology, computer-aided drug design integrating artificial intelligence algorithms can eliminate the challenges and hurdles of traditional drug design and development. Artificial intelligence is referred to as superset comprising machine learning, whereas machine learning comprises supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning. Further, deep learning, a subset of machine learning, has been extensively implemented in drug design and development. The artificial neural network, deep neural network, support vector machines, classification and regression, generative adversarial networks, symbolic learning, and meta-learning are examples of the algorithms applied to the drug design and discovery process. Artificial intelligence has been applied to different areas of drug design and development process, such as from peptide synthesis to molecule design, virtual screening to molecular docking, quantitative structure-activity relationship to drug repositioning, protein misfolding to protein-protein interactions, and molecular pathway identification to polypharmacology. Artificial intelligence principles have been applied to the classification of active and inactive, monitoring drug release, pre-clinical and clinical development, primary and secondary drug screening, biomarker development, pharmaceutical manufacturing, bioactivity identification and physiochemical properties, prediction of toxicity, and identification of mode of action.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningAlgorithmsAnimalsBig DataChemistry Techniques, SyntheticData MiningDrug DesignDrug DevelopmentDrug DiscoveryHumansMachine LearningModels, MolecularQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipResearch DesignSupport Vector MachineArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networksComputer-aided drug designDeep learningDrug design and discoveryDrug repurposingMachine learningQuantitative structure–activity relationshipVirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID33844136
PMCPMC8040371

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.