ArticleBioscience reports2021
More evidence for prediction model of radiosensitivity.
Article in Bioscience reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stemness-related gene signatures as a predictive tool for breast cancer radiosensitivity.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Discovery of a DNA repair-associated radiosensitivity index for predicting radiotherapy efficacy in breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Predicting radiotherapy efficacy and prognosis in tongue squamous cell carcinoma through an in-depth analysis of a radiosensitivity gene signature.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Improving the efficacy of combined radiotherapy and immunotherapy: focusing on the effects of radiosensitivity.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2023Review
- Value of pre-treatmentEuropean journal of radiology open · 2023Article
- Development and validation of an immune-related gene signature for predicting the radiosensitivity of lower-grade gliomas.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Integration of immune and hypoxia gene signatures improves the prediction of radiosensitivity in breast cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the development of precision medicine, searching for potential biomarkers plays a major role in personalized medicine. Therefore, how to predict radiosensitivity to improve radiotherapy is a burning question. The definition of radiosensitivity is complex. Radiosensitive gene/biomarker can be useful for predicting which patients would benefit from radiotherapy. The discovery of radiosensitivity biomarkers require multiple pieces of evidence. A prediction model of breast cancer radiosensitivity based on six genes was established. We had put forward some supplements on the basis of the present study. We found that there were no differences between high- and low-risk scores in the non-radiotherapy group. Patients who received radiotherapy had a significantly better overall survival than non-radiotherapy patients in the predicted low-risk score patients. Furthermore, there was no difference between radiotherapy group and non-radiotherapy group in the high-risk score group. Those results firmly supported the prediction model of radiosensitivity. In addition, building a radiosensitivity prediction model was systematically discussed. Genes of model could be screened by different methods, such as Cox regression analysis, Lasso Cox regression method, random forest algorithm and other methods. In the future, precision radiotherapy might depend on the combination of multi-omics data and high dimensional image data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.