ReviewActa biomaterialia2021
Engineered in vitro tumor models for cell-based immunotherapy.
Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Structure-functionality relationship of collagen-fibrin interpenetrating hydrogels for engineered tumor-stroma models.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Article
- Antibody screening for tumor and immune hotspot targets: The frontier of new methods and technologies.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2026Review
- Modeling CAF-tumor interactions to overcome therapy resistance.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026Review
- Microfluidic chips for decoding cancer-immune crosstalk in immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Endogenous modulators in lung cancer.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Outer membrane vesicles-based nano-regulator for cancer immunotherapy by modulating neutrophils N1 polarization and hitchhiking delivery.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Extracellular vesicles as biomarkers and drug delivery systems for tumor.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
- Targeting protein modification: a new direction for immunotherapy of pancreatic cancer.International journal of biological sciences · 2025Review
- Nanostructured Biomaterials in 3D Tumor Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: Regenerative Medicine and Immunotherapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Article
- Research progress on the application of organoids in gynecological tumors.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Fluid-Dynamic Culture of Tumour and Immune Cells for More Predictive Infiltration Studies and Immunotherapy Drug Screening.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Patient-derived organoids as personalized avatars and a potential immunotherapy model in cervical cancer.iScience · 2023Article
- Breast cancer organoids and their applications for precision cancer immunotherapy.World journal of surgical oncology · 2023Review
- Advances in post-translational modifications of proteins and cancer immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Natural polysaccharides exert anti-tumor effects as dendritic cell immune enhancers.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Engineered Microphysiological Systems for Testing Effectiveness of Cell-Based Cancer Immunotherapies.Cancers · 2022Review
- A multi-organ-on-chip to recapitulate the infiltration and the cytotoxic activity of circulating NK cells in 3D matrix-based tumor model.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor immunotherapy is rapidly evolving as one of the major pillars of cancer treatment. Cell-based immunotherapies, which utilize patient's own immune cells to eliminate cancer cells, have shown great promise in treating a range of malignancies, especially those of hematopoietic origins. However, their performance on a broader spectrum of solid tumor types still fall short of expectations in the clinical stage despite promising preclinical assessments. In this review, we briefly introduce cell-based immunotherapies and the inhibitory mechanisms in tumor microenvironments that may have contributed to this discrepancy. Specifically, a major obstacle to the clinical translation of cell-based immunotherapies is in the lack of preclinical models that can accurately assess the efficacies and mechanisms of these therapies in a (patho-)physiologically relevant manner. Lately, tissue engineering and organ-on-a-chip tools and microphysiological models have allowed for more faithful recapitulation of the tumor microenvironments, by incorporating crucial tumor tissue features such as cellular phenotypes, tissue architecture, extracellular matrix, physical parameters, and their dynamic interactions. This review summarizes the existing engineered tumor models with a focus on tumor immunology and cell-based immunotherapy. We also discuss some key considerations for the future development of engineered tumor models for immunotherapeutics. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Cell-based immunotherapies have shown great promise in treating hematological malignancies and some epithelial tumors. However, their performance on a broader spectrum of solid tumor types still fall short of expectations. Major obstacles include the inhibitory mechanisms in tumor microenvironments (TME) and the lack of preclinical models that can accurately assess the efficacies and mechanisms of cellular therapies in a (patho-)physiologically relevant manner. In this review, we introduce recent progress in tissue engineering and microphysiological models for more faithful recapitulation of TME for cell-based immunotherapies, and some key considerations for the future development of engineered tumor models. This overview will provide a better understanding on the role of engineered models in accelerating immunotherapeutic discoveries and clinical translations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.