Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33858871›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2021

Prehospital stratification in acute chest pain patient into high risk and low risk by emergency medical service: a prospective cohort study.

Kristoffer Wibring, Markus Lingman, Johan Herlitz, Sinan Amin, Angela Bång

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kristoffer WibringInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Gothenburg University, Sahlgrenska Academy, Goteborg, Sweden kristoffer.wibring@gu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-6910-230X
Markus LingmanDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine/Cardiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg, Sweden.
Johan HerlitzThe Prehospital Research Center Western Sweden, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden.
Sinan AminDepartment of Cardiology, Halland Hospital, Halland County, Halmstad, Sweden.
Angela BångInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Gothenburg University, Sahlgrenska Academy, Goteborg, Sweden.
Hallands sjukhus Halmstad · SEAmbulance Care (Sweden) · SEUniversity of Borås · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe contemporary characteristics and diagnoses in prehospital patients with chest pain and to identify factors suitable for the early recognition of high-risk and low-risk conditions.

designProspective observational cohort study.

settingTwo centre study in a Swedish county emergency medical services (EMS) organisation.

participantsUnselected inclusion of 2917 patients with chest pain contacting the EMS due to chest pain during 2018. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Low-risk or high-risk condition, that is, occurrence of time-sensitive diagnosis on hospital discharge.

resultsOf included EMS missions, 68% concerned patients with a low-risk condition without medical need of acute hospital treatment in hindsight. Sixteen per cent concerned patients with a high-risk condition in need of rapid transport to hospital care. Numerous variables with significant association with low-risk or high-risk conditions were found. In total high-risk and low-risk prediction models shared six predictive variables of which ST-depression on ECG and age were most important. Previously known risk factors such as history of acute coronary syndrome, diabetes and hypertension had no predictive value in the multivariate analyses. Some aspects of the symptoms such as pain intensity, pain in the right arm and paleness did on the other hand appear to be helpful. The area under the curve (AUC) for prediction of low-risk candidates was 0.786 and for high-risk candidates 0.796. The addition of troponin in a subset increased the AUC to >0.8 for both.

conclusionsA majority of patients with chest pain cared for by the EMS suffer from a low-risk condition and have no prognostic reason for acute hospital care given their diagnosis on hospital discharge. A smaller proportion has a high-risk condition and is in need of prompt specialist care. Building models with good accuracy for prehospital identification of these groups is possible. The use of risk stratification models could make a more personalised care possible with increased patient safety.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeEmergency Medical ServicesChest PainElectrocardiographyEmergency Service, HospitalHumansProspective StudiesRisk Factorsaccident & emergency medicinecardiologymyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID33858871
PMCPMC8055143
OpenAlexW3156197007

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.