Observational studyBMJ open2021
Prehospital stratification in acute chest pain patient into high risk and low risk by emergency medical service: a prospective cohort study.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- The development of a decision support tool in the prehospital setting for acute chest pain - a study protocol for an observational study (BRIAN2).Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Treat and release: an observational study of non-conveyed high-acuity dispatches in a Danish emergency medical system.Internal and emergency medicine · 2024Observational
- Prehospital management and outcomes of patients calling with chest pain as the main complaint.International journal of emergency medicine · 2024Article
- The performance of screening tools and use of blood analyses in prehospital identification of sepsis patients and patients suitable for non-conveyance - an observational study.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Observational
- Prehospital Targeting of 1-Year Mortality in Acute Chest Pain by Cardiac Biomarkers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Clinical presentation in EMS patients with acute chest pain in relation to sex, age and medical history: prospective cohort study.BMJ open · 2022Observational
- Prehospital assessment of patients with abdominal pain triaged to self-care at home: an observation study.BMC emergency medicine · 2022Observational
- Suboptimal prehospital decision- making for referral to alternative levels of care - frequency, measurement, acceptance rate and room for improvement.BMC emergency medicine · 2022Review
- The potential of new prediction models for emergency medical dispatch prioritisation of patients with chest pain: a cohort study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2022Observational
- Guideline adherence among prehospital emergency nurses when caring for patients with chest pain: a prospective cohort study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo describe contemporary characteristics and diagnoses in prehospital patients with chest pain and to identify factors suitable for the early recognition of high-risk and low-risk conditions.
designProspective observational cohort study.
settingTwo centre study in a Swedish county emergency medical services (EMS) organisation.
participantsUnselected inclusion of 2917 patients with chest pain contacting the EMS due to chest pain during 2018. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Low-risk or high-risk condition, that is, occurrence of time-sensitive diagnosis on hospital discharge.
resultsOf included EMS missions, 68% concerned patients with a low-risk condition without medical need of acute hospital treatment in hindsight. Sixteen per cent concerned patients with a high-risk condition in need of rapid transport to hospital care. Numerous variables with significant association with low-risk or high-risk conditions were found. In total high-risk and low-risk prediction models shared six predictive variables of which ST-depression on ECG and age were most important. Previously known risk factors such as history of acute coronary syndrome, diabetes and hypertension had no predictive value in the multivariate analyses. Some aspects of the symptoms such as pain intensity, pain in the right arm and paleness did on the other hand appear to be helpful. The area under the curve (AUC) for prediction of low-risk candidates was 0.786 and for high-risk candidates 0.796. The addition of troponin in a subset increased the AUC to >0.8 for both.
conclusionsA majority of patients with chest pain cared for by the EMS suffer from a low-risk condition and have no prognostic reason for acute hospital care given their diagnosis on hospital discharge. A smaller proportion has a high-risk condition and is in need of prompt specialist care. Building models with good accuracy for prehospital identification of these groups is possible. The use of risk stratification models could make a more personalised care possible with increased patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.