Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33860189›Full record

ReviewACS pharmacology & translational science2021

Ultrasound-Responsive Nanocarriers in Cancer Treatment: A Review.

Nahid S Awad, Vinod Paul, Nour M AlSawaftah, Gail Ter Haar, Theresa M Allen, William G Pitt, Ghaleb A Husseini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Acoustically Activatable Drug-Loaded Nanodroplets for Mechanochemical Therapy in Solid Tumors.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Ultrasound-responsive liposomes: A mechanistic framework to decode the effects of acoustic parameters.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Stimuli-Responsive Supramolecular Biomaterials for Cancer Theranostics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Polymeric nanocarriers for therapeutic gene delivery.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2025
    Review
  19. Responsive biomaterials for therapeutic strategies of hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nahid S AwadDepartment of Chemical Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Vinod PaulDepartment of Chemical Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Nour M AlSawaftahDepartment of Chemical Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Gail Ter HaarJoint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5NG, U.K.
Theresa M AllenDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada.
William G PittDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, United States.
Ghaleb A HusseiniDepartment of Chemical Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16464Cancer Research UK 19727Pancreatic Cancer UK 2018RIF_29
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The safe and effective delivery of anticancer agents to diseased tissues is one of the significant challenges in cancer therapy. Conventional anticancer agents are generally cytotoxins with poor pharmacokinetics and bioavailability. Nanocarriers are nanosized particles designed for the selectivity of anticancer drugs and gene transport to tumors. They are small enough to extravasate into solid tumors, where they slowly release their therapeutic load by passive leakage or biodegradation. Using smart nanocarriers, the rate of release of the entrapped therapeutic(s) can be increased, and greater exposure of the tumor cells to the therapeutics can be achieved when the nanocarriers are exposed to certain internally (enzymes, pH, and temperature) or externally (light, magnetic field, and ultrasound) applied stimuli that trigger the release of their load in a safe and controlled manner, spatially and temporally. This review gives a comprehensive overview of recent research findings on the different types of stimuli-responsive nanocarriers and their application in cancer treatment with a particular focus on ultrasound.

Identifiers

PMID33860189
PMCPMC8033618

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.