ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2021
Cardiac Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Impact of Biological and Chemical Inducers.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in MicroRNA-Based Therapies for Cardiac Repair: Emerging Strategies for Treating Myocardial Infarction.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2026Review
- Hierarchical therapeutic potential in the mesenchymal stem cell landscape.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Semiquantitative Cardiac-Specific Gene Expression Validation of the DNA Methylation Microarray in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Genetically modified mesenchymal stromal cells: a cell-based therapy offering more efficient repair after myocardial infarction.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Review
- Article
- Novel biphasic mechanism of the canonical Wnt signalling component PYGO2 promotes cardiomyocyte differentiation from hUC-MSCs.Cell and tissue research · 2023Article
- Effect of CDM3 on co-culture of human-induced pluripotent stem cells with Matrigel-covered polycaprolactone to prepare cardiac patches.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2023Article
- Direct Cardiac Reprogramming: Current Status and Future Prospects.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Review
- Cell-Based and Selected Cell-Free Therapies for Myocardial Infarction: How Do They Compare to the Current Treatment Options?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Genome-wide methylome pattern predictive network analysis reveal mesenchymal stem cell's propensity to undergo cardiovascular lineage.3 Biotech · 2022Article
- SDF-1/CXCR4-Mediated Stem Cell Mobilization Involved in Cardioprotective Effects of Electroacupuncture on Mouse with Myocardial Infarction.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022Article
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell Application and Its Therapeutic Mechanisms in Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disorders (CVDs) are the leading cause of global death, widely occurs due to irreparable loss of the functional cardiomyocytes. Stem cell-based therapeutic approaches, particularly the use of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) is an emerging strategy to regenerate myocardium and thereby improving the cardiac function after myocardial infarction (MI). Most of the current approaches often employ the use of various biological and chemical factors as cues to trigger and modulate the differentiation of MSCs into the cardiac lineage. However, the recent advanced methods of using specific epigenetic modifiers and exosomes to manipulate the epigenome and molecular pathways of MSCs to modify the cardiac gene expression yield better profiled cardiomyocyte like cells in vitro. Hitherto, the role of cardiac specific inducers triggering cardiac differentiation at the cellular and molecular level is not well understood. Therefore, the current review highlights the impact and recent trends in employing biological and chemical inducers on cardiac differentiation of MSCs. Thereby, deciphering the interactions between the cellular microenvironment and the cardiac inducers will help us to understand cardiomyogenesis of MSCs. Additionally, the review also provides an insight on skeptical roles of the cell free biological factors and extracellular scaffold assisted mode for manipulation of native and transplanted stem cells towards translational cardiac research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.