Evidence mapPaperPMID 33865310Full record

SynthesisBMC geriatrics2021

A systematic review of the evidence for deprescribing interventions among older people living with frailty.

Kinda Ibrahim, Natalie J Cox, Jennifer M Stevenson, Stephen Lim, Simon D S Fraser, Helen C Roberts

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 117 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
22.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06324045 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Development and Evaluation of a Multidisciplinary Team Delivered Deprescribing Intervention for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease in Qatar: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHamad Medical CorporationRan2024 to 2026Enrolled424ConditionsChronic Kidney DiseasesArmsDeprescribing
NCT07114094 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Development and Validation of a Deprescribing Tool Relevant to the Indian Context and Evaluation of Its Effectiveness in Reducing Inappropriate Polypharmacy in the Elderly

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndian Council of Medical ResearchRan2025 to 2026Enrolled1,650ConditionsElderlyArmsDeprescribing Tool
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 243 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kinda IbrahimAcademic Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. k.ibrahim@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5709-3867
Natalie J CoxAcademic Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Jennifer M StevensonInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, UK.
Stephen LimAcademic Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Simon D S FraserNIHR Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, Southampton, UK.
Helen C RobertsAcademic Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
University of Southampton · GBNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder people living with frailty are often exposed to polypharmacy and potential harm from medications. Targeted deprescribing in this population represents an important component of optimizing medication. This systematic review aims to summarise the current evidence for deprescribing among older people living with frailty.

methodsThe literature was searched using Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library up to May 2020. Interventional studies with any design or setting were included if they reported deprescribing interventions among people aged 65+ who live with frailty identified using reliable measures. The primary outcome was safety of deprescribing; whereas secondary outcomes included clinical outcomes, medication-related outcomes, feasibility, acceptability and cost-related outcomes. Narrative synthesis was used to summarise findings and study quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute checklists.

resultsTwo thousand three hundred twenty-two articles were identified and six (two randomised controlled trials) were included with 657 participants in total (mean age range 79-87 years). Studies were heterogeneous in their designs, settings and outcomes. Deprescribing interventions were pharmacist-led (n = 3) or multidisciplinary team-led (n = 3). Frailty was identified using several measures and deprescribing was implemented using either explicit or implicit tools or both. Three studies reported safety outcomes and showed no significant changes in adverse events, hospitalisation or mortality rates. Three studies reported positive impact on clinical outcomes including depression, mental health status, function and frailty; with mixed findings on falls and cognition; and no significant impact on quality of life. All studies described medication-related outcomes and reported a reduction in potentially inappropriate medications and total number of medications per-patient. Feasibility of deprescribing was reported in four studies which showed that 72-91% of recommendations made were implemented. Two studies evaluated and reported the acceptability of their interventions and further two described cost saving.

conclusionThere is a paucity of research about the impact of deprescribing in older people living with frailty. However, included studies suggest that deprescribing could be safe, feasible, well tolerated and can lead to important benefits. Research should now focus on understanding the impact of deprescribing on frailty status in high risk populations.

trial registrationThe review was registered on the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) ID number: CRD42019153367 .

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsFrailtyAgedAged, 80 and overHumansPolypharmacyPotentially Inappropriate Medication ListQuality of LifeDeprescribingFrailtyInappropriate medicationsMedication reviewPolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID33865310
PMCPMC8052791
OpenAlexW3107594151

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.