ReviewThe Lancet. Global health2021
Randomised trials at the level of the individual.
Review in The Lancet. Global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04727424 (A Multicenter, Prospective, Adaptive, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of Fluvoxamine Plus Budesonide, Fluoxetine Plus Budesonide and Spirulin Platensis, in High Risk Patients With Mild COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Prospective, Adaptive, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of Fluvoxamine Plus Budesonide, Fluoxetine Plus Budesonide and Spirulin Platensis, in High Risk Patients With Mild COVID-19
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic methodology review of fluorescence-guided cancer surgery to inform the development of a core master protocol and outcome set.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Design and analysis of umbrella trials: Where do we stand?Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Immunogenicity of a Third Scheduled Dose of Rotarix in Australian Indigenous Infants: A Phase IV, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2022Trial
- Sleep apnoea and its consequences: from animal models to precision medicine.Sleep medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- No frugal innovation without frugal evaluation: the Global IDEAL Sub-Framework.BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies · 2024Article
- Biopsychosocial rehabilitation therapy in small fiber neuropathy: research protocol to study the effect of rehabilitation treatment.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- An explainable machine learning-based phenomapping strategy for adaptive predictive enrichment in randomized clinical trials.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- The economic challenges of new drug development.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2022Article
- Urgently seeking efficiency and sustainability of clinical trials in global health.The Lancet. Global health · 2021Review
- How COVID-19 has fundamentally changed clinical research in global health.The Lancet. Global health · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In global health research, short-term, small-scale clinical trials with fixed, two-arm trial designs that generally do not allow for major changes throughout the trial are the most common study design. Building on the introductory paper of this Series, this paper discusses data-driven approaches to clinical trial research across several adaptive trial designs, as well as the master protocol framework that can help to harmonise clinical trial research efforts in global health research. We provide a general framework for more efficient trial research, and we discuss the importance of considering different study designs in the planning stage with statistical simulations. We conclude this second Series paper by discussing the methodological and operational complexity of adaptive trial designs and master protocols and the current funding challenges that could limit uptake of these approaches in global health research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33865474What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.