Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33866636›Full record

ArticleInsect molecular biology2021

Identification of new Anopheles gambiae transcriptional enhancers using a cross-species prediction approach.

I Schember, M S Halfon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insect molecular biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

I SchemberDepartment of Biochemistry, University at Buffalo-State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.
M S HalfonDepartment of Biochemistry, University at Buffalo-State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4149-2705

Funding

Regulatory element discovery in Anopheles gambiaeR21AI125918 · NIAID · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI HALFON, MARC S · 2016 to 2017
$449k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI125918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of transgenic mosquito vector control approaches relies on well-targeted gene expression, requiring the identification and characterization of a diverse set of mosquito promoters and transcriptional enhancers. However, few enhancers have been characterized in Anopheles gambiae to date. Here, we employ the SCRMshaw method we previously developed to predict enhancers in the A. gambiae genome, preferentially targeting vector-relevant tissues such as the salivary glands, midgut and nervous system. We demonstrate a high overall success rate, with at least 8 of 11 (73%) tested sequences validating as enhancers in an in vivo xenotransgenic assay. Four tested sequences drive expression in either the salivary gland or the midgut, making them directly useful for probing the biology of these infection-relevant tissues. The success of our study suggests that computational enhancer prediction should serve as an effective means for identifying A. gambiae enhancers with activity in tissues involved in malaria propagation and transmission.

Indexed as

Regulatory Elements, TranscriptionalAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedAnophelesComputational BiologyDrosophila melanogasterGene ExpressionGene Expression RegulationGenome, InsectMalariaMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsPromoter Regions, Geneticcis-regulatory elementcomputational enhancer predictioncross-species enhancer discoveryDrosophila melanogastermalariamosquito controlregulatory genomicsvector biology

Identifiers

PMID33866636
PMCPMC8266755

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.