Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33868415›Full record

ArticlePostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2021

Fractional flow reserve, quantitative flow ratio, and instantaneous wave-free ratio: a comparison of the procedure-related dose of ionising radiation.

Greta Ziubryte, Gediminas Jarusevicius

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparison of FFR, iFR, and QFR assessment in patients with severe aortic stenosis and coronary heart disease.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Greta ZiubryteDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics, Institute of Cardiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Gediminas JaruseviciusDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics, Institute of Cardiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe development of interventional cardiology increases the number of invasive procedures which are inevitably associated with increased exposure to ionizing radiation and associated risks. A percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) substantiated by evaluation of the coronary artery lesion's functional significance is recommended by both European and American cardiologists. Nevertheless, the prevalence of physiology-guided PCIs does not exceed 10% all over the globe.

aimTo identify the physiology evaluation method which is associated with the lowest exposure to ionising radiation. MATERIAL AND

methodsAnonymised data of 421 patients with stable angina pectoris for whom elective coronary artery angiography followed by physiological assessment of intermediate coronary artery stenosis was performed were prospectively included in this study. Only diagnostic-procedure-related data of dose of ionizing radiation were analysed. Physiological assessment of coronary artery lesions was performed by fractional flow reserve (FFR), quantitative flow ratio (QFR), or instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR).

resultsCompared to FFR as a reference, fluoroscopy time (FT) was almost half in QFR and almost double in iFR,

conclusionsQFR is associated with significantly reduced exposure to ionising radiation compared to both FFR and iFR. Therefore, wider QFR application in clinical practice could eliminate any additional exposure to ionising radiation and increase the prevalence of physiology-guided coronary artery revascularization.

Indexed as

fractional flow reserveinstantaneous wave-free ratioionising radiationphysiology-guided coronary revascularisationquantitative flow ratio

Identifiers

PMID33868415
PMCPMC8039935
OpenAlexW3140371163

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.